12-03-2012 10:42 PM - edited 03-07-2019 10:22 AM
Hi
I have 2 ISP connected to Router A and Router B
Both the routers are connected to the core 3750 switch.. I want to send the traffic from the switch that goes to router A to router B...
I have done the following but its not working...
vlan 120 = 10.120.0.0/24
vlan 140 = 10.140.0.0/24
access-list 120 permit ip 10.120.0.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 140 permit ip 10.140.0.0 0.0.0.255 any
Create a policy that matches on these acls:
route-map NewISP permit 10
match ip address 120
set ip next-hop <new asa ip>
route-map NewISP permit 20
match ip address 140
set ip next-hop <new asa ip>
Then apply to your vlan interfaces:
int vlan 120
ip policy route-map NewISP
int vlan 140
ip policy route-map NewISP
12-03-2012 11:04 PM
Hi Sheraiz,
Is the Next-hop IPs are directly connected to the switch where you have configured the policy?
Are you seign ARP entries on your switch for the next-hop IPs
Thanks
Raju
12-03-2012 11:26 PM
Hi
Yes the Internet Router is directly connected to the switch.
I am woundering the port where the Router is connected on the switch should be a normal port, or should I configure this as a non switch port.
Thank you
12-03-2012 11:45 PM
Hi,
1° ip routing must be enabled on the switch, verify with sh ip route output where you should see your SVIs as directly connected networks
2° you must have the correct SDM template for PBR: verify with sh sdm prefer and change if needed with sdm prefer, you'll nedd to reload for it to take effect
you need this template for PBR:
Desktop dual IPv4 and IPv6 routing template
3° you need IPservices to be able to do PBR, verify with sh version | i IOS
4° of course the exit interface must be a L3 interface so a routed port(no switchport) or a SVI( int vlan)
Regards.
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
12-04-2012 12:17 AM
I have all the requirements as per above.
The port on the switch where the router connects is a no switch port and I have given the IP, and router is directly connected to that port.
Just not sure where data cannot go to second router.
12-03-2012 11:47 PM
Can you paste the show ip route
Raju
12-04-2012 12:08 AM
Thank for your Email. The template that I have on the 3750 is Desktop Routing and version is 15.0 (0) SE.
I think the routing is working as I have the below :
route-map newisp permit 10
match ip address 120
set ip next-hop 172.20.20.2
!
Gateway of last resort is 192.168.100.1 to network 0.0.0.0
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 192.168.100.1
172.20.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 12 subnets, 2 masks
C 172.20.10.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan110
L 172.20.10.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan110
C 172.20.20.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan120
L 172.20.20.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan120
C 172.20.30.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan130
L 172.20.30.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan130
C 172.20.40.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan140
L 172.20.40.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan140
C 172.20.50.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan150
L 172.20.50.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan150
--More--
003201: *Mar 1 23:59:57.542: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGDP: list 100 denied icmp 172.20.
20.80 -> 192.168.171.30 (3/3), 1 packet
C 172.20.60.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan180
L 172.20.60.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan180
192.168.10.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 192.168.10.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10
L 192.168.10.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan10
192.168.20.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 192.168.20.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan20
L 192.168.20.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan20
C 192.168.28.0/22 is directly connected, Vlan30
192.168.30.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
L 192.168.30.1 is directly connected, Vlan30
192.168.40.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 192.168.40.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan40
L 192.168.40.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan40
192.168.50.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 192.168.50.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan50
L 192.168.50.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan50
192.168.60.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 192.168.60.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan60
L 192.168.60.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan60
192.168.70.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 192.168.70.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan70
L 192.168.70.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan70
192.168.80.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 192.168.80.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan80
L 192.168.80.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan80
192.168.90.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 192.168.90.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan90
L 192.168.90.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan90
192.168.100.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 192.168.100.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet2/0/35
L 192.168.100.2/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet2/0/35
C 192.168.168.0/22 is directly connected, Vlan1
192.168.168.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
L 192.168.168.168 is directly connected, Vlan1
12-04-2012 12:41 AM
Hi,
what is the result of a traceroute on a host from each subnet ?
Regards.
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
12-04-2012 07:37 PM
Hi
I can ping and run the tracert, but I cannot get the Internet data.
I can ping the switch port - which connect to the Router..but I cannot get to the router..
12-04-2012 11:31 PM
Hi,
what do you mean i can't get the internet data? so you can ping and traceroute to 8.8.8.8 but cannot get a web page( either by name or by IP) ?
Regards.
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
12-05-2012 01:01 AM
My Route Map is Set, but I get ping google.com..
Even tracert does not work.
My switch port ip is 192.168.200.2 - 255.255.255.0
and the Router is 192.168.200.10/24
pbr is enable and route Map is applied to the int Vlan180.
I cannot get access to any Data. and when I apply the Ip policy I get the following error : ""PLATFORM PBR 3 UNSUPPORTED RMAP : Route Map kddi not supported for PBR..""
Please advise.
Thank you
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide