11-30-2015 02:02 AM - edited 03-08-2019 02:53 AM
Hi,
I have 2 Nexus5000 completed with 2 nexus 2000.
I am trying to get a vPC up between both.
On the nexus 5000 :
Int eth103/1/13
switchport mode trunk
switchtrunk trunk native vlan 110
switchport trunk allowed 2,3,4
channel-group 121 mode active
interface port-channel 121
switchport trunk native vlan 110
switch trunk allowed vlan 2,3,4
vpc 121
On the other nexus :
interface eth104/1/12
switchport mode trunk
switch trunk native vlan 110
switchport trunk allowed vlan 2,3,4
channel-group 121 mode active
Interface po121
switch mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan 110
switchport trunk allowed vlan 2,3,4
vpc 121
Sh int ethernet104/1/12 >> up and up
sh int po121 >> down and down (no operational members)
why?
:)
thanks!
12-02-2015 08:53 AM
...although it does declare the eth104/1/2 as a "Members in this channel"
12-02-2015 09:02 AM
ok thats strange as to connect a device to a server on 2k ports in po you just need a standard port-channel setup rather than a vpc setup
The citrix side is definitly set to team yes
Try this command it will tell whether the 5k is even trying to form the po through lacp, if you see sent packets and none on recieve there s an issue on server side
Show lacp counters interface po 200
should look like this if servers not responding being sent by 5k but nothing coming back
# Show lacp counters interface po 177
LACPDUs Marker Marker Response LACPDUs
Port Sent Recv Sent Recv Sent Recv Pkts Err
---------------------------------------------------------------------
port-channel177
Ethernet117/1/2 453 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ethernet118/1/2 433 0 0 0 0 0 0
12-02-2015 09:10 AM
the funny thing is that I have nother VPC (199) just neighbor...working just fine!
Anyway :
on Po200:
Sent : 35606
Rvc : 68
On the working vPC :
Sent 35399
Rcv : 35373
12-02-2015 02:01 PM
Hmmm Ye you should not need vpc because it's a fex and 5k already does that bit,but either way I had issue like this before linux server was set for lacp seen the same as you posted ,nexus doing it's best sending the packets to try form th po but even though it was set for lacp the linux guy had to set the lacp on there side to be aggressive that fixed it packets started flooding in from server side.To me from experience something s not right on server side you set that many packets but received so few,I don't think your config is wrong
12-03-2015 05:35 AM
Thank you.
12-03-2015 05:35 AM
Do you want stars ? :)
12-03-2015 06:38 AM
ah theres no point marking it till its fixed :) then its useful as the fixed ones show up for other users if they have the same issue , did you have any luck on the server side ?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide