05-07-2013 02:33 AM - edited 03-07-2019 01:13 PM
Hi
I have some 3750 switches in a network, where I need to transport a QinQ connection between them.
SwitchA <-> SwitchB <-> SwitchC <-> SwitchD
Need the QinQ from switchA port 11 and to SwitchD port 9.
Betveen the switches interfaces are in standard 082.1Q trunk mode.
What do I need to configure to make this happend?
I need to make sure that the VLANs in and out of these interfaces do not conflict with the rest of the network, as some VLANs will overlap.
05-07-2013 09:37 AM
There are a lot of writeups on it out there on the internet. Here is one that may be useful:
http://technologyordie.com/802-1q-tunneling-aka-qinq
- Be sure to rate all helpful posts
05-08-2013 12:30 AM
Hello,
QinQ lets add a second tag (provider tag). 802.1q tunneling let apply "special" BPDU (CDP, STP...) for L2 protocols.
Administrative mode "switch mode dot1q-tunnel" do the QinQ. After you need a special command for each L2 protocol
you need "transport" in the QinQ tunnel.
VERY IMPORTANT!!!. You also need change the MTU in all switches because now you MTU needs 4 bytes else (the new 802.1q tag). Use the command "system mtu 1504". It could be needed a reboot to apply the command.
Regards.
05-08-2013 12:50 AM
Hello
Below is a configuration steps as posted by Antonio.
1) Configure all switches with mtu of 1504 and power cycle
2) SwitchA <-> SwitchB <-> SwitchC <-> SwitchD - Configure trunks between
3) make sure vtp domain is configured and all vlans have propergated throught the switches -
vtp domain xx
SwitchA port 1
SwitchD port 9
clear cdp table
sh l2protocol-tunnel summary
sh dot1q-tunnel
res
Paul
Please don't forget to rate any posts that have been helpful.
Thanks.
05-08-2013 01:07 AM
Hello again,
notice that MAC-learning is active and all switch will see the users MAC. This is an issue to be considered because
threre is a limit in the number of MAC a switch can learn. If there is non-redundancy topology and each switch has
2 interfaces in the VLAN that made the tunnel, you can disable the MAC-learning without problems to bypass this
issue.
Regards.
05-13-2013 06:56 AM
Hello,
do not be worried about security. QinQ is as secured as VLAN are. The can have scalability issues as MAC limit or
broadcast storms. Notice that broadcast (and multicast) affect CPU so you must control this packets. You can use
IF-MIB and snmp to measure it . 100 pps are a good limit. We have 15K users a huge VLANs and broadcast are under this threshold. You can also use the following link to control broadcast storms:
Regards.
05-13-2013 06:15 AM
Thank you all for pinching in here
My main concern here, is this safe?
I mean, I`m transporting this QinQ for another company.
This means I have no control over VLANs they transport etc...
Can I be sure this does not interfere with my network?
05-22-2013 05:33 AM
Another question here. Must VTP be used, why?
I rather not if I do not have to.
05-24-2013 12:59 AM
Bumping again.
Setting up at test setup here, having some trouble.
Must VTP be used, or is it sufficient to use a VLAN that exists on all switches, and use it?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide