07-06-2014 10:07 PM - edited 03-07-2019 07:56 PM
Hello all.
Is it correct that routers don't have a base Ethernet MAC address (but switches have) and the only MACs that routers have are the BIAs in the interfaces?
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-08-2014 01:07 PM
Yes the MAC's are different. Routers don't have a system MAC (they may with the ethernet HWIC card installed though).
07-07-2014 07:34 PM
Keeping this thread alive.
Thanks
07-07-2014 08:39 PM
Depends. Are you talking for something like spanning tree or for something like HSRP/VRRP? Generally speaking in STP, a switch has a base MAC (chassis's use the Sup MAC, stackables typically use use lowest interface -1).
07-07-2014 08:48 PM
Hello Collin.
Depends. Are you talking for something like spanning tree or for something like HSRP/VRRP? Generally speaking in STP, a switch has a base MAC (chassis's use the Sup MAC, stackables typically use use lowest interface -1).
Is the base MAC used for STP different from the one used in HSRP? I'm actually referring to the base MAC shown in the output of sh version on a switch. I just noticed that routers don't have a base MAC in the output of sh version.
07-08-2014 01:07 PM
Yes the MAC's are different. Routers don't have a system MAC (they may with the ethernet HWIC card installed though).
07-09-2014 09:27 AM
Thanks for clarifying this. So you won't see a base Ethernet MAC on a router unless you have an Ethernet HWIC card installed. Alright. Though I don't have an HWIC card to test this, can you please mention what command should be used to view the base Ethernet MAC incase an Ethernet HWIC card is installed on a router?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide