04-11-2015 02:06 AM - edited 03-07-2019 11:29 PM
Hello,
I am using WS-C3550-48 and trying to simple thing by transfer file from server a(fa0/1) to server b(fa0/2). When I take a look the traffic with "sh int fa0/1 sum", this shows rx amount raising and in other part when I run "sh int fa0/2 sum" this shows tx amount raising.
Both using straight through cable, any clue ?
Thanks in advance
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-13-2015 01:30 AM
Hi,
I think your understanding about RX/TX is wrong here.
From the switch point of view, the switch is receiving the file(RX) from Server A on Fa0/1.
Once switch determines that the traffic (file) need to reach Server B on Fa0/2, it transmits (TX) over Fa0/2. Does it make sense ?
If not imagine both your hands as Fa0/1 and Fa0/2 and you in the middle as Switch itself.
You are receving something on your right hand(RX) (imagin FA0/1), once receieved, you decide to hand over it OUT (TX)through left hand (Fa0/2)....
Hope it helps.
Thanks,
Madhu
04-12-2015 12:47 AM
How are you trying to transfer the file? Tftp? ....
getting an error message?
can you ping the server?
servers on same vlan?
Different vlan?
Server blocking access? Firewall?
04-12-2015 07:12 AM
> How are you trying to transfer the file? Tftp? ....
just ftp
> getting an error message?
No, ftp running fine and files delivered to destination
> can you ping the server?
Ofcourse yes
> servers on same vlan?
Yes same vlan
04-12-2015 10:28 AM
Hi,
transfer file from server a(fa0/1) to server b(fa0/2).
This means for Fa0/1 ---> traffic will be RX from Server A - Expected
for Fa0/2 --> The file is being send towards from Switch port to Server B -- Expected.
So i don't think you have a problem. Please clarify if you still have questions.
Hope this helps and rate all useful posts.
Thanks,
Madhu.
04-12-2015 09:42 PM
I don't get it, fa0/1 transfer/tx/transmitted file to fa0/2. So fa0/1 tx should be increase. isn't it normally work like that ?
04-13-2015 01:30 AM
Hi,
I think your understanding about RX/TX is wrong here.
From the switch point of view, the switch is receiving the file(RX) from Server A on Fa0/1.
Once switch determines that the traffic (file) need to reach Server B on Fa0/2, it transmits (TX) over Fa0/2. Does it make sense ?
If not imagine both your hands as Fa0/1 and Fa0/2 and you in the middle as Switch itself.
You are receving something on your right hand(RX) (imagin FA0/1), once receieved, you decide to hand over it OUT (TX)through left hand (Fa0/2)....
Hope it helps.
Thanks,
Madhu
04-13-2015 01:35 AM
Aha, if that logic works like that, I am in wrong perception then.
Thank you for correcting me.
04-13-2015 09:17 PM
@Madhukrishnan, is it possible to make it like normal hub. fa0/1 will detect server A transfer file as tx(without set the port to no switchport) ?
Thanks in advanced
04-13-2015 09:40 PM
Hi Nokoya,
Sorry, i did not understand your question. Could you please explain little more.
Thanks,
Madhu.
04-13-2015 09:44 PM
I am trying to get storm-control running. But with this condition, it does not work.
So I have to make it to be when server A(fa0/1) send file to server B(fa0/2), on interface summary, fa0/1 it show increasing of tx and fa0/2 show increasing of rx.
Thanks in advanced
04-13-2015 10:11 PM
I think that will not work. Even if you attempt make it as a hub, it won' send the packets it received on Fa0/1 back to it.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide