11-30-2023 07:07 AM
Hi,
I have a problem with Spanning-tree on mixed brand switch
FOR RESUME :
There is one C3850 (SW1) using only spanning tree and 2 Siemens Scalance Switch (SW2 and SW3)
In the configuration below, SW3 manage "Alternate port" between SW3/SW2
C3850 is the root, but alternate port is manage by Scalance and there is a bug.
- SW3/SW1 Disconnect and reconnect : No problem;
- SW3/SW2 Disconnect and reconnect : No problem;
- SW2/SW1 Disconnect : No problem ... Reconnect: The scalance that manages "Alternate port" (SW3) disable directly the port between SW3/SW2 before the connection between "SW2/SW1" (C3850) is ready (5 seconds).
Is it possible to force the Cisco to use the Gi2/1/2 port to be alternate? When trying with the priority, I only managed to move the alternate port to SW2
Good da
11-30-2023 07:12 AM
Show spanning tree
Where is root for this spanning tree domain?
12-03-2023 11:22 PM
On SW1, Cisco C3850
12-03-2023 11:37 PM
On C3850 by default, SW3 manage the alternate port between (SW2/SW3).
11-30-2023 09:33 AM
looks like „sw 2“ is the root bridge.
- just lower the STP root-priority of your cisco-stack
conf t
spanning-tree vlan 1 priority 4096
end
…for example.
- than sw1 will act as the root of the stp topology with active interfaces
- the link between sw2 and sw3 will get „blocked“ at one of both switches sw2 or sw3.
12-03-2023 11:32 PM
OK, but is the simple drawing with for identical VLAN, there is 4 different loop with scalance connected on this network. There is no risk to define on each subloop a Root ?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide