Subnetting

[jonk34567]

for below attached diagram i did the sub-netting below. is it correct ? also if the static routing is used what are the routing table entries in each router.

  192.168.3.0/24  is  the network

5 computers  ---192.168.3.0/29

7 computers  ---192.168.3.0/28

14 computers  ---192.168.3.16 /28

[Mark Malone]

Hi
your host section is correct in terms of the amount of usable users per subnet but its all the same subnet /24 your breaking down so you cant have 2 network subnets that both start with .0

192.168.3.0/29 = 192.168.3.1 - 6 usable
192.168.3.8/29 = 192.168.3.9 - 15 usable
192.168.3.16/28 = 192.168.3.17 - 30 usable

[jonk34567]

5 computers  ---192.168.3.0/29

7 computers  ---192.168.3.0/28

are they wrong because both start with 0 ? but they are 2 different subnet masks

[Mark Malone]

Yes because they both cant start with same ip address space , even though there different subnet masks there under same supernet /24 the /29s and /28 exist under this space so only 1 of them can take the first set of ips

[jonk34567]

also may i know the routing table entries in each router

[Julio E. Moisa]

Hi

I think it was a typo, but using VLSM the network should be: 

192.168.3.0/28   --- 14 hosts

192.168.3.16/29  --- 7 hosts

192.168.3.24/29  --- 5 hosts

192.168.3.32/30  -- P2P

192.168.3.36/30  -- P2P

192.168.3.40/30  -- P2P

192.168.3.42/30  -- P2P

[jonk34567]

also may i know the routing table entries in each router 

[Julio E. Moisa]

Hi

You could see the entries through; show ip route, on each router. 

[paul driver]

Hello

Have a look at the attach file -it may provide you with a clearer explanation  to your query.

res
Paul

[jonk34567]

thank you very much but it does not have any routing table entries

[paul driver]

Hello

---

@jonk34567 wrote:

thank you very much but it does not have any routing table entries

---

Apologies but what do yo mean by routing entry's?

res

Paul