03-07-2012 05:12 AM - edited 03-07-2019 05:24 AM
hi,
i have layer 3 switch 4506e connected to layer 2 switch 2960
Layer 3's gig2/4 connected to layer 2's gig0/1
layer 3 gig2/4 config
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 10
switchport mode trunk
layer 2 gig0/1 config
switchport trunk native vlan 10
switchport mode trunk
My question is we dont need to configure encapsulation at layer 2 end??
if no, why??
03-07-2012 05:32 AM
The only thing that I can think of is that the 2960 doesn't support ISL and only supports dot1q trunking. You can see this by doing "sh inter g0/1 trunk" on the 2960. It will tell you what trunking protocol it's using. I didn't have time to look for the documentation on the 2960 though, so this is really just a guess.....
03-07-2012 05:35 AM
John,
You are absolutely correct: Catalysts 2950 and 2960 do not support ISL. They support only 802.1Q (which is the only VLAN tagging protocol in use today, anyway). Therefore the command switchport trunk encapsulation is not available because there are no alternatives to choose from.
It's strange that old 2900XL switches supported ISL, as it predated the 802.1Q, then the 2950/2960 do not support it and support only 802.1Q, but 3550/3560/3750 and higher switches stil (or again?) support ISL along with 802.1Q.
Best regards,
Peter
03-07-2012 10:47 AM
Yeah it would be nice if they would just standardize and get rid of ISL at this point.
03-07-2012 11:55 AM
It's strange that old 2900XL switches supported ISL, as it predated the 802.1Q, then the 2950/2960 do not support it and support only 802.1Q, but 3550/3560/3750 and higher switches stil (or again?) support ISL along with 802.1Q.
That's not all that's strange. Guess what standard the old 1900 support: ISL only.
03-08-2012 10:07 PM
thank u very very much
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: