02-18-2013 03:17 AM - edited 03-07-2019 11:45 AM
Hi people,
Sorry if this has been answered before, but I've done some trawling and can't find anything just yet (but I'll keep looking!).
I've got a Cisco 4510 which shows a system uptime in excess of 56 years. This is presumably a bug...can anyone please tell me more?
A sh ver readout is included below.
Cheers,
-Jerry
-----
Cisco IOS Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500-ENTSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(53)SG1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Fri 30-Oct-09 13:31 by prod_rel_team
Image text-base: 0x10000000, data-base: 0x1209D16C
ROM: 12.2(20r)EW1
Dagobah Revision 226, Swamp Revision 34
xxxx uptime is 56 years, 4 weeks, 2 days, 13 hours, 46 minutes
Uptime for this control processor is 2 years, 49 weeks, 1 day, 10 hours, 8 minutes
System returned to ROM by redundancy reset
System restarted at 00:49:38 GMT Fri Mar 12 2010
System image file is "bootflash:cat4500-entservicesk9-mz.122-53.SG1.bin"
This product contains cryptographic features and is subject to United
States and local country laws governing import, export, transfer and
use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply
third-party authority to import, export, distribute or use encryption.
Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for
compliance with U.S. and local country laws. By using this product you
agree to comply with applicable laws and regulations. If you are unable
to comply with U.S. and local laws, return this product immediately.
A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products may be found at:
http://www.cisco.com/wwl/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html
If you require further assistance please contact us by sending email to
cisco WS-C4510R (MPC8245) processor (revision 4) with 524288K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FOX113314QD
MPC8245 CPU at 400Mhz, Supervisor V
Last reset from Redundancy Reset
7 Virtual Ethernet interfaces
112 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
511K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
Configuration register is 0x2
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-20-2013 02:27 AM
Hi Jeremiah,
Kindly reload the device to get this correct. We have seen couple of instances like this and found to be a bug. I cannot share the bug details publically nevertheless one of them is the one which you had listed above.
HTH.
Regards
Inayath
02-20-2013 03:07 AM
Hi Jere, Please find the bug details:CSCsg00796. Recommendation is that to reboot the switches. Now that you are on SG code, it should be possible to resolve this by a reboot.
HTH.
Regards
Inayath.
02-19-2013 05:32 AM
Additional info: I've got 3x other 4510s on the same software image and none of them are seeing this issue.
Hrmmm....
02-19-2013 06:51 AM
I've now come across bug CSCtr54218 which seems like it might be by problem. Can anyone possibly tell me if I'm on the right track?
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtr54218&from=summary
My only concerns are that this lists Sup7E as seeing the issue but I'm running Supervisor V, and also my specific image,
12.2(56)SG1, is not listed as known to be affected by this issue.
Any help appreciated.
Thanks people.
-Jerry
02-19-2013 07:39 AM
It is not a bug. I am 49 years old, and I remember hearing about this system when going to primary school, Our teacher spoke about it like a miracle, she said... "imagine - a Cisco devices not crashing for 15 years!!!". Good to know it is still running!
02-19-2013 02:24 PM
Paolo,
How could a SupV card be 56 years old?
02-20-2013 01:03 AM
Hahaha, Paolo. Thanks for the laugh.
leolaohoo, Paolo was being facetious...not serious.
Still not sure what to think here. But at least the problem is likely cosmetic. Since the other three switches don't have the issue I imagine that a reload will see the problem disappear.
But I'd still like to know what has caused it.
02-20-2013 02:27 AM
Hi Jeremiah,
Kindly reload the device to get this correct. We have seen couple of instances like this and found to be a bug. I cannot share the bug details publically nevertheless one of them is the one which you had listed above.
HTH.
Regards
Inayath
02-20-2013 02:37 AM
Hi InayathUlla,
Thanks for the reply. I suspected a reload would correct it, so we'll try to work that into the schedule in the future.
Can you at least tell me if the bug has been corrected in a later version, and if so which?
02-20-2013 02:40 AM
They say it to be on the latest one.
Regards
Inayath.
02-20-2013 02:43 AM
Hi Inayath,
I'm sorry, but that's still a little unclear. Does "it to be on the latest one" mean the bug still exists on the latest one, or that the best advice Cisco can offer is to upgrade to the latest version, where the bug is known to be fixed?
02-20-2013 03:07 AM
Hi Jere, Please find the bug details:CSCsg00796. Recommendation is that to reboot the switches. Now that you are on SG code, it should be possible to resolve this by a reboot.
HTH.
Regards
Inayath.
02-20-2013 05:32 AM
Thank you, Inayath. At least now I have some official word to back me up to the bosses.
Thanks again!
-Jerry
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide