cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2112
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies

TCP Window Scaling supported on 3750G and 2960G switches?

jwa999999
Level 1
Level 1

We have the 3750G with the IOS version 12.2(35)SE5. Does this IOS version and switch support the TCP Window Scaling detailed in this doc?  The doc says Release 12.2(8)T.  And I don't see the 3750G or the 2960G platforms listed in the doc. I'm guessing they're not but rather than guess, I thought I'd ask.  Thanks

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t8/feature/guide/tcpwslfn.pdf

4 Replies 4

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Disclaimer

The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

I don't know, but you have tried setting ip tcp window-size > 64 KB?  That's probably the quickest way to settle that question on your particular device.

BTW, what do you think this command will do for you?  It doesn't impact traffic transiting the Cisco device, it only affects TCP traffic going to the Cisco device itself.

No, we've not tried modifying the settings.  The doc says you may see better performance.  Thanks for the tip about how it works.

Disclaimer

The  Author of this posting offers the information contained within this  posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that  there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose.  Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not  be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this  posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In  no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including,  without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out  of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author  has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

The doc says you may see better performance.

Indeed you may, but the doc also notes "Do not use this command unless you clearly understand why you want to change the default value.".

The two common situations where there's possible benefit to increasing the device's TCP receive window are:  to allow faster FTP/RCP downloads to the device or to support quicker BGP bulk transfers.  The former is limited by write speed to flash and the latter might be unusual to need > 64 KB for BDP.

Also, BTW, if you do find a need to work with scaled TCP receive windows on a Cisco device, you probably also should enable (optional) SACK.

You will not see better switch performance with this command, or any other.

For the reason that Josep has explained you above.