09-13-2010 02:55 AM - edited 03-06-2019 12:56 PM
I have the following problem with
Situation:
- 2x 3750G-12S Distribution-Switches (DS) and several 3560/2960 Access-Switches (AS)
- redundant Fiber optic uplinks between AS and DS
- Cross-Stack Etherchannel config on all uplinks
- UDLD aggressive mode configured on all uplinks
Problem:
- when I reload the DS and the switch comes up again, I've lost the connection with several (not all) AS
- looking at the AS log I found the following error message: "%UDLD-4-UDLD_PORT_DISABLED: UDLD disabled interface Gi0/1, aggressive mode failure detected"
Cause:
- in the log of the AS I don't see intf Gi0/1 go down during the reload of the DS
- this means the DS didn't shuts down all its ports during the reload
- but this also means that UDLD on AS didn't know about DS reload, and therefore didn't resets counters
Workaroud/Solution
- I'm now configuring errdisable recovery on all AS
So I'm forced to configure errdisable recovery, even if I don't want.
Any other solutions/workaround?
For Cisco guys: what do you think about my case: it has to be considered a Cisco bug?
Regards, Gio.
09-13-2010 06:36 AM
Hello,
How are the DS and AS switches connected? Do you have any patch panel or
signal booster in between? When you reload the switches, the switch will
turn-off all the ports for a short duration. You can see that in the console
logs when the switch was rebooting. So, if in your case it is not happening,
it could be a hardware issue or a software issue. Can you remove one of the
connections from the DS and see if the corresponding AS reports link down?
Regards,
NT
09-14-2010 04:53 AM
Hi Nagaraja,
yesterday evening I reloaded two more Distribution Stacks (upgrade from 12.2(50)SE3 to 12.2(55)SE due to a SW Bug) and I experienced again the same problem.
Here below an example of the logging on the AS:
000329: Sep 13 14:43:08: %UDLD-4-UDLD_PORT_DISABLED: UDLD disabled interface Gi0/1, aggressive mode
failure detected
000330: Sep 13 14:43:08: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: udld error detected on Gi0/1, putting Gi0/1 in err-disable state
000331: Sep 13 14:43:09: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed
state to down
000332: Sep 13 14:43:10: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
000333: Sep 13 14:43:11: %UDLD-4-UDLD_PORT_DISABLED: UDLD disabled interface Gi0/2, aggressive mode
failure detected
000334: Sep 13 14:43:11: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: udld error detected on Gi0/2, putting Gi0/2 in err-disable state
000335: Sep 13 14:43:12: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed
state to down
Note: no "interface GigabitEthernet x/y changed to state down" message before the errdisable message, even if the device on the other side of the uplink was reloaded.
I'm sure that I have no active components between the AS and the DS.
Attention: I reviewed all logs of my lasts reload activities and one interesting things comes out: each time I experienced the UDLD Errdisable problem it was on Gigabit COPPER uplinks.
So it seems the 3750 Distribution switches didn't put in down state the Gigabit Copper SFP modules ...
04-29-2013 11:27 PM
I had the same problem as you tonight while upgrading a WS-C2960-24TT-L. When it rebooted, the neighbour-switch put the 10/100/1000BaseTX interface in err-disable state.
Here's the log from the neighbouring WS-C2960-24TT-L:
Apr 30 00:41:33.756 UTC: %UDLD-4-UDLD_PORT_DISABLED: UDLD disabled interface Gi0/2, aggressive mode failure detected
Apr 30 00:41:33.756 UTC: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: udld error detected on Gi0/2, putting Gi0/2 in err-disable state
Apr 30 00:41:34.763 UTC: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to down
Apr 30 00:41:35.778 UTC: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to down
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide