- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-27-2019 10:08 AM
Hi,
what is the benefit of building a Network just for IP Phones (voice/video) with on big /22 VLAN on one Core (Catalyst 68xx VSS) with 15-20 FEX?
(The Network serves only voice traffic)
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Catalyst 6000
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-27-2019 10:57 AM
Hi,
It is usually better to keep the broadcast domain smaller. So, instead of a /22, you can create 4 /24s. This way if something happened to one vlan, it doesn't effect the other ones. Or if you want to apply a policy to one vlan and not all the other 3. Overall, segmentation gives you more flexibility.
HTH
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-27-2019 10:57 AM
Hi,
It is usually better to keep the broadcast domain smaller. So, instead of a /22, you can create 4 /24s. This way if something happened to one vlan, it doesn't effect the other ones. Or if you want to apply a policy to one vlan and not all the other 3. Overall, segmentation gives you more flexibility.
HTH
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-28-2019 11:17 AM
On L3 switches, routing isn't the bottleneck it once was. Something like a Catalyst 68xx generally has sufficient resources to handle lots of networks. So, big networks, like your /22 don't really offer much in the way of any benefit. They can, though, tie up a large address block, which might have a low host usage. Also, a larger network (again like a /22) exposes host to the broadcast scalability issue. Lastly, if your ports are data/voice, your VoIP devices are exposed to physical port traffic, such as broadcasts, from the data VLAN too (although the VoIP phone "logically" will ignore it).
