12-11-2023 07:00 AM
Hi everyone ,what is the difference between cisco cbs and catalyst.I am using C9300L-24T-4X-A or CBS350-24T-4X for a customer. 2 switches are sufficient for my port needs and I do not have a very large network. What are the disadvantages of using CBS350 for me?
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-11-2023 07:05 AM
Hello @cemrecanaltinel
The Cisco Catalyst and CBS series serve different market segments. The Catalyst switches are enterprise-grade, offering advanced features and scalability, while CBS switches are designed for small to medium-sized businesses with simpler needs.
In your case, using either the Cisco Catalyst C9300L-24T-4X-A or CBS350-24T-4X depends on your specific requirements. The Catalyst switch is more feature-rich and suitable for larger networks with advanced needs, while the CBS switch is a cost-effective solution for smaller setups.
Disadvantages of using the CBS350 for your scenario might include limited advanced features compared to the Catalyst series. If your network is not expected to grow significantly, and you don't require the advanced capabilities of the Catalyst, the CBS350 can be a more economical choice.
Consider factors like scalability, feature requirements, and budget constraints to make an informed decision based on your specific network needs.
12-11-2023 07:24 AM
Your're so welcome @cemrecanaltinel
Here the holy bible: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/csbms/CBS_250_350/Administration-Guide/cbs-350.pdf
12-11-2023 07:05 AM
Hello @cemrecanaltinel
The Cisco Catalyst and CBS series serve different market segments. The Catalyst switches are enterprise-grade, offering advanced features and scalability, while CBS switches are designed for small to medium-sized businesses with simpler needs.
In your case, using either the Cisco Catalyst C9300L-24T-4X-A or CBS350-24T-4X depends on your specific requirements. The Catalyst switch is more feature-rich and suitable for larger networks with advanced needs, while the CBS switch is a cost-effective solution for smaller setups.
Disadvantages of using the CBS350 for your scenario might include limited advanced features compared to the Catalyst series. If your network is not expected to grow significantly, and you don't require the advanced capabilities of the Catalyst, the CBS350 can be a more economical choice.
Consider factors like scalability, feature requirements, and budget constraints to make an informed decision based on your specific network needs.
12-11-2023 07:17 AM
thank you for reply.It s so helpful explanation.I want to ask one thing,can I cofigure simple configuration on cbs350 such as create a vlan,assign a vlan,configure snmp or configure port mirroring etc ?
12-11-2023 07:24 AM
Your're so welcome @cemrecanaltinel
Here the holy bible: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/csbms/CBS_250_350/Administration-Guide/cbs-350.pdf
12-11-2023 10:37 AM
"I want to ask one thing,can I cofigure simple configuration on cbs350 such as create a vlan,assign a vlan,configure snmp or configure port mirroring etc ?"
The short answer is yes. However those feature may need to be configured somewhat differently than in the Catalyst line.
12-11-2023 07:06 AM
- Small business devices usually are more limited in capacities , as for instance throughput and (up) link ,
M.
12-11-2023 08:11 AM
"Hi everyone ,what is the difference between cisco cbs and catalyst."
$$$, for one major difference! ; )
As the other posters have noted the two switches are directed toward different markets. Basically, it's somewhat similar to VWs versus Mercedes. Both autos provide transportation, but not with the same amenities nor possibly with the same zero to sixty times.
You write two 24 port switches are sufficient for your port needs and the network isn't very large. Unfortunately, those two attributes, alone, possibly aren't sufficient to well determine whether you should use a Catalyst switch vs. a CBS switch.
Unfortunately, doing an adequate analysis to determine a suitable switch isn't easy (nor inexpensive).
Truthfully, many smaller businesses choose the less expensive option because that's all they can afford.
Larger businesses will often choose the more expensive switch "just-in-case" and because they can afford to (it also avoids a time consuming and expensive analysis [and the funds that would be needed for analysis can, instead, be applied to the more expensive switch]).
BTW, in my experience, really large Enterprises do sometimes conduct detailed platform selection analysis but usually just in two cases. First, when you're looking to acquire lots (hundred+) of such devices or the device is very, very expensive (million+). Otherwise, a very large Enterprise works on obtaining the best discount off list percentage possible (along with other "considerations").
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide