03-03-2013 05:55 PM - edited 03-18-2019 12:42 AM
Hi
We must maintain codec using telnet
Before upgrading to TC6.0, connected codec using telnet.
But After upgrading to TC6.0, cannot
Message:
getnameinfo: localhost: Success
Temporary failure in name resolution: Success
(don't have name server)
we need name server necessarily for using telnet?
or What's another method ?
Thanks for your help always
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-03-2013 09:04 PM
Hi Soohyung,
I confirmed the issue happned on our EX60, too.
It seems that the misconfiguration of TC6.0 OS causes this.
I guess we must wait for Cisco releases TC6.0.1.
Anyway, we can use SSH instead, as a workaround.
Kotaro Hashimoto
03-03-2013 09:04 PM
Hi Soohyung,
I confirmed the issue happned on our EX60, too.
It seems that the misconfiguration of TC6.0 OS causes this.
I guess we must wait for Cisco releases TC6.0.1.
Anyway, we can use SSH instead, as a workaround.
Kotaro Hashimoto
03-04-2013 12:49 AM
Hello,
I checked TC6.0.1 on our C40 here in Brussels and I see that the codec does a so-called reverse DNS lookup for the host which is connecting to the codec.
In my case, the IP address of the codec is 144.254.13.69 and the unix system which tries to connect has IP address
144.254.10.208. When I do telnet to the codec I see following DNS messages :
Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info
2010-01-27 08:13:29 144.254.13.69 144.254.71.184 DNS 87 Standard query PTR 208.10.254.144.in-addr.arpa
2010-01-27 08:13:29 144.254.71.184 144.254.13.69 DNS 191 Standard query response PTR sweet-brew-7.cisco.com
2010-01-27 08:13:29 144.254.13.69 144.254.71.184 DNS 82 Standard query A sweet-brew-7.cisco.com
2010-01-27 08:13:29 144.254.13.69 144.254.71.184 DNS 82 Standard query AAAA sweet-brew-7.cisco.com
2010-01-27 08:13:29 144.254.71.184 144.254.13.69 DNS 166 Standard query response A 144.254.10.208
2010-01-27 08:13:29 144.254.71.184 144.254.13.69 DNS 142 Standard query response
In linux these lookups can be turned off, but the codec file system will be rebuilt after reload so we would lose any changes. Let me ask in our meeting with escalation whether this can be turned off.
03-04-2013 02:41 AM
I just tried it on my ex90/tc6 and telnet works fine when DNS is reachable (I have reverse
entries configured) and it does not work if I block the lookup with the same error message.
The ssh connection takes much longer to connect, but at least it works without DNS.
Workarounds could be:
* use ssh (anyhow recommended, what is stopping you to do so? Only reason I see would be the TCNC sw)
* use the webinterface
* properly configure DNS (also recommended :-)
* add the remote hosts ip and name in /etc/hosts
* disable the lookup which locks it
* if its defined as a bug (and not for example as a security features): wait for a upgrade
* possible more
Danny: I would say the workaround could be to add a startup script adding the entry to the hosts file or to
disable the lookup, how / on which level would you do that? os-level, nnswitch, xinetd, telnetd?
Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify
03-04-2013 03:20 AM
I think the things are set at xinetd level.
[hdewulf-c40:/etc/xinetd.d] $ pwd
/etc/xinetd.d
[hdewulf-c40:/etc/xinetd.d] $ cat telnet
service telnet
{
disable = no
id = telnet
socket_type = stream
wait = no
flags = REUSE IPv6
user = root
group = root
server = /extra/sbin/in.telnetd
}
[hdewulf-c40:/etc/xinetd.d] $
When I block my traffic to my DNS servers I learnt via DHCP I get my telnet closed indeed.
sweet-brew-7:/home/dderidde # telnet 144.254.13.69
Trying 144.254.13.69...
Connected to 144.254.13.69.
Escape character is '^]'.
getnameinfo: localhost: Success
Temporary failure in name resolution: Success
Connection to 144.254.13.69 closed by foreign host.
sweet-brew-7:/home/dderidde #
Let me raise the question on our weekly call we have with the TelePresence business unit.
03-04-2013 04:09 AM
It's reported via CSCue72551 TC6.0.0.876266: Telneting to EX90/C90 failed .
/Hans
03-15-2013 01:17 PM
Hi Danny,
Any movement on this issue? Thanks in advance
03-16-2013 01:18 AM
Hello,
the root cause of the problem has been fixed. It's now a matter of waiting for released code with the fix integrated. I have no release schedule for TC6.x release(s), so cannot comment on ETA of the release.
10-18-2017 10:05 AM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide