Changing Outgoing Number

Jason Ryan · ‎07-25-2013

I know this question has been asked a but of different ways but there always seems to be a slight different from what I need.

I have 2 Security System devices that run into some ATAs. The ATA are registered to my CUCM 9. Heres what I want.

I have a main line number of 945XXXX that all phones are seen as externally. I want to change that for these ATAs. Instead of being seen as the main line I want to see them at 955XXXX.

I have the Route List Use Calling Partys External Phone Number Mask to On. I then set the External Phone Number Mask on the DN on the ATA to 955XXXX. In the Calling Party Transform Mask ffield under the Route List I have my main line of 945XXXX.

However, the ATA is still seen as the main number when dialing out 945XXXX.

What am I missing?

Thank you

Jason

George Thomas · ‎07-25-2013

You could do a DNA and see where its been overwritten. Also, does the route pattern have Use Calling Partys External phone number mask to On?

Please rate useful posts.

Jason Ryan · ‎07-25-2013

Ill do the analysis and see what I find.

The route pattern does not have it on. I was under the impression the route list would take precedence though I could be very mistaken.

Jonathan Schulenberg · ‎07-26-2013

You're correct that downstream options do override it. For reference, here are the places it could be influenced:

Route Pattern
Route Group Appearance
Gateway/Trunk Transformation Patterns
IOS voice translation-profile
Provider ignoring what you set and forcing the ANI

Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify helpful or correct answers.

Jason Ryan · ‎07-26-2013

Im tempted to think its something at the provider based on this fact:

When I removed the 945XXXX number from the Calling Party Trasnform Mask Field, its turned into a number that we arent currently using.

Thoughts on that?

George Thomas · ‎07-26-2013

This could potentially be provider overriding. if you have a PRI and a Cisco Gateway, you could do a debug isdn q931, test the call and see what you are sending and if its different from what you receive, it will be provider based. If its a sip trunk and Cisco gateway, debug ccsip messages should help you.

Please rate useful posts.

Jason Ryan · ‎07-26-2013

It is a PRI and Cisco Gateway. Ill see what I can dig up on that end.

It might be in Group Appearance on the CUCM. I dont think the Gateway would be the issue but I posted the relavant Gateway (2951) config here just to see if maybe I missed something.

!

voice translation-rule 1

rule 1 /^7800/ /1601/

rule 15 /^..../ /1601/

!

voice translation-profile PRI-Incoming

translate called 1

!

controller T1 0/0/0

cablelength long 0db

pri-group timeslots 1-24 service mgcp

!

controller T1 0/0/1

cablelength long 0db

!

controller T1 0/0/2

cablelength long 0db

!

controller T1 0/0/3

cablelength long 0db

!

voice-port 0/0/0:23

output attenuation 3

!

dial-peer voice 1 pots

translation-profile incoming PRI-In

destination-pattern 9.T

incoming called-number .T

direct-inward-dial

port 0/0/0:23

!

telephony-service

srst mode auto-provision none

srst dn line-mode dual

max-ephones 100

max-dn 200

ip source-address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port 2000

timeouts interdigit 5

max-conferences 2 gain -6

transfer-system full-consult

transfer-pattern .T

secondary-dialtone 9

!