09-09-2010 12:34 AM - edited 03-19-2019 01:33 AM
Hello,
I have seen a lot of discutions about this combination. I have one wich is not working. IFXO which is configued as mgcp. I have connection plar opx on a voice-port.
From what I know it is mondatory to don't have connection plar under voice-port when configured as mgcp gateway.
Is there a posibility to make them work? I have seen that Attendan DN under the Call Manager MGCP gateway is doing the same as connection plar. What about when it is in SRST mode? Dose the Attendant DN solve the connection plar under the voice-port in SRST mode?
Best Regards,
Nelu Cirstea
Solved! Go to Solution.
09-09-2010 01:12 AM
Hi
Well - if that is still current, then it's another reason to go H.323. Without connection plar outside callers will just get dial tone when they dial your number, and would have to dial an internal extension number to reach anyone. It also opens up possibility of dialling other PSTN numbers so the call routes back out and you get to pay for the call.
Regards
Aaron
09-09-2010 12:41 AM
Hi
The Attendant DN is only found on MGCP FXO ports, and is where CallManager will send the call - so when the gateway is not registered to the CallManager (i.e. in SRST mode), this setting will have no effect.
As far as I'm aware, in SRST mode, the connection PLAR command should take effect, but when registered to MGCP the CCM attendant DN config should override that. Is that not happening?
To be honest 100% of the FXO ports I've set up have been H.323 - primarily because that supports caller-ID whereas MGCP does not. In that mode, you would always have the PLAR command in effect, but would have the dial-peers pointing to CCM as the primary destination when not in SRST mode.
Regards
Aaron
Please rate helpful posts...
09-09-2010 12:51 AM
Hi Aaron,
Thank you for your quik answer.
At the folowing link it is writeen that:
Do not configure any of these functions:
Under Dial Peers
destination-pattern
session target
Under Voice Ports
connection { plar | tie-line | trunk }
It is a document from 2006. May be it is a old one.
Regards,
Nelu
09-09-2010 01:12 AM
Hi
Well - if that is still current, then it's another reason to go H.323. Without connection plar outside callers will just get dial tone when they dial your number, and would have to dial an internal extension number to reach anyone. It also opens up possibility of dialling other PSTN numbers so the call routes back out and you get to pay for the call.
Regards
Aaron
03-19-2015 01:48 AM
is the attendant dn only functions the connection plar ? If so why it's mandatory in mgcp fxo configuration in cucm 7 ?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide