08-13-2010 02:07 PM - edited 03-01-2019 09:41 AM
Welcome to the Cisco Networking Professionals Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn how to troubleshoot Nexus 5000 & 2000 series with Lucien Avramov. Lucien Avramov is a Customer Support Engineer at the Cisco Technical Assistance Center. He currently works in the data center switching team supporting customers on the Cisco Nexus 5000 and 2000. He was previously a technical leader within the network management team. Lucien holds a bachelor's degree in general engineering and a master's degree in computer science from Ecole des Mines d'Ales. He also holds the following certifications: CCIE #19945 in Routing and Switching, CCDP, DCNIS, and VCP #66183.
Remember to use the rating system to let Lucien know if you have received an adequate response.
Lucien might not be able to answer each question due to the volume expected during this event. Our moderators will post many of the unanswered questions in other discussion forums shortly after the event. This event lasts through August 30, 2010. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other community members.
08-20-2010 09:00 AM
Lucien,
I see you listed the compatibility link for 1Gb transceivers in this blog.
I bought the GLC-T-AX SFP (Axiom flavor) for the Nexus 5020 - this is for a trunk link back to my 3750 (CAT5) switch port.
I cannot get the link to come up...no lights, no indication of any kind that the two switches see each other.
Do you know if anyone else is having trouble using these Axiom SFPs? ...or am I missing something?
Thanks,
Paul.
08-20-2010 09:35 AM
Nexus is very sensitive to which SFPs you are using.
You need to use Cisco branded SFP.
The compatibility guide for 1GB (I listed only the 10GB earlier) is here:
You can see that it mentions : GLC-T and not the GLC-T-AX.
If you do a show interface on your Nexus CLI or a show interface brief, it will tell you the reason the link is down "SFP validation failed" for example.
Also I will add here on the 5010, only the first 8 ports can be downgraded to a speed of 1000 and for the 5020, the first 16 ports.
08-20-2010 10:03 AM
Thanks for replying so quickly. I do see that the -AX flavor is not listed but the switch does recognize it...see below.
Do you see anything that would indicate that it is not supported? I've also opened a TAC case to verify either way!
shonexus01# sho int ether1/1 transceiver details
Ethernet1/1
sfp is present
name is OEM
part number is GLC-T-AX
revision is 1.0
serial number is MGT801992
nominal bitrate is 1300 MBits/sec
cisco id is --
cisco extended id number is 4
Invalid calibration
shonexus01#
Thanks - hopefully, others looking to purchase 1Gb SFPs read this note if it turns out that these SFPs from Axiom are not supported!!
Paul.
08-20-2010 10:14 AM
The problem is that your SFP is not CISCO, it's OEM.
A proper example of output would be:
show int e1/1 transceiver details
Ethernet1/1
sfp is present
name is CISCO-MOLEX INC
type is 10Gbase-(unknown)
part number is 74752-9025
revision is A
serial number is MOC12432433
nominal bitrate is 12000 MBits/sec
Link length supported for copper is 1 m(s)
cisco id is --
cisco extended id number is 4
08-20-2010 12:10 PM
Forgot to include you an example for 1GB of the GLC-T (again GLC-T-AX is not cisco part) :
show int e1/1 transceiver details
Ethernet1/1
sfp is present
name is CISCO-AVAGO
type is 10Gbase-(unknown)
part number is ABCU-5710RZ-CS2
revision is
serial number is AGM120527BX
nominal bitrate is 1300 MBits/sec
Link length supported for copper is 100 m(s)
cisco id is --
cisco extended id number is 4
08-22-2010 01:22 PM
Hello Lucien,
We are trying to migrate some C6500 QoS configuration to Nexus 5000. It's a typical scenario when migrating from standalone
C6500 to VSS as distribution with N5K and FEX 2148 as access layer. However we have some problems mostly regarding QoS.
The first problem is that we can't perform packet DSCP marking (yes, we can classify)
but instead we need to use CoS marking.
Q1: Is there any plans in the near future to support DSCP marking on N5K?
Other problem is that Nexus is lacking policing capabilities and the documentation is not
clear on this matter.
Q2: For example is there anyway we can achieve something like
police cir 10000000 bc 4000 be 4000 conform-action set-dscp-transmit af42 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit violate-action policed-dscp-transmit
I see that we can guarantee BW but I can't find any info whats happens when congestion occur?
Q3: If don't use, and don't plan to use FCoE at all, should we just "reserve" 0% of BW to FCoE traffic? If not what's the minimum
we can reserve for fcoe class?
class type queuing class-fcoe
bandwidth percent 0
Q4: Regarding Q2
Is it possible remark traffic that exceeds CIR? We can use bandwidth command for CIR but I can't see anything else we can use
for remarking.
Thank you
08-23-2010 11:53 AM
08-23-2010 12:59 PM
Hi,
thank you for your reply, regarding DSCP classification, are there any drawbacks
when classification occurs on N5K instead on FEX?
08-23-2010 02:24 PM
Regarding drawbacks, I'm not sure, at the end of the day the traffic from/to the FEX will go trough the N5K as it's in it's data path. Probably this involves more CPU usage on the N5K, but I don't see a major drawback.
About your previous post, you can remark traffic with CoS on the 5k.
For remarking of DSCP : it will be supported in the future. As a workaround, you can mark CoS instead of DSCP and then remap the Cos to the desired DSCP on an upstream switch.
As far as policing, more policing features are coming soon, again I can't provide you here the timeframes, but your system engineer can.
08-24-2010 03:41 AM
Can you please provide us with the example config? As far as I can see, there is no option
to remark traffic, with CoS that exceeded the CIR.
08-24-2010 07:18 AM
To remark CoS that exceeded CIR you need policing on top of marking.
What I meant is that you can remark CoS from one value to another by matching CoS ingress, and changing it to another qos-group that sets a different CoS value.
If you look at my example above that can be achieved with the match, set qos-group then set cos for that qos-group (in the network-cos) policy-map.
08-25-2010 08:58 AM
Lucien,
Two Questions:
1) Can you provide an update on allowing the Nexus 5K to support more than twelve N2Ks? We were told that there was a roadmap plan to allow the 5K to support up to sixteen N2Ks.
2) I have an environment where Data Center VLANs exist in two adjacent locations. The Data Center has a N7K core, and the old Data Center has a Cat4500 core. They are interconnected via 10GB. Most of the L3 SVIs for the Data Center VLANs still reside on the Cat4500 core, as are the STP roots.
Within the new Data Center, the N5Ks are connected to the N7Ks via vPC. I would like to support port-channel on N2K-attached hosts, so have enabled vPC on the N5Ks for this purpose. My concern is with STP root priority. With vPC enabled, does the STP root need to live on the N7K? N5K? Or can it continue to live on the Cat4500 until migration is complete?
Thank you,
-rb
08-25-2010 12:19 PM
1) Yes it is on the roadmap and will be supported. I'm not able to disclose a date for this feature, the best I can do on this forum is to advise you to contact your Cisco System Engineer / Sales / Account team, they can provide you the specifics offline.
2) The question here is just spanning tree related, the vpc is just seen as a regular etherchannel from the 7k and 4500 side.
When you will take out of production your 4500, then you will have spanning tree to reconvergence and elect the new root.
If you move the root before from the 4500 to the 7k, the same process will occur. So really it shouldnt matter at this point.
Design guide covering on page 6 the best practices for spanning-tree on NX-OS with VPC:
08-26-2010 11:47 AM
Posted on wrong discussion
08-26-2010 12:19 PM
Hi Lucien,
I have servers with CNA adapters for both IP and SAN connectivity and want to connect to two Nexus 5K. Do you recommend using VPC from the 5K and aggregating the links on the server, or would using VPC-HM (assuming I use Nexus 1000V) be a better route to go. Do you have a sample configuration of how I would connect the server using VPC from the 5K assuming that I have 2 SAN fabrics (say VLAN 100 for fabric_A and VLAN 200 for fabric_B)?
Thanks
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide