cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
324
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

Check power availability failure after upgrading blade to 4.3.5a

Valkyrie3
Level 1
Level 1

I have a UCS 5108 chassis with eight B200 M5's, I upgraded the chassis manager from 4.3.4a to 4.3.5a at Christmas time but when upgrading a blade from 4.2.1f to 4.3.5a this week it failed at the following step:

Associate Check Power Availability - Check if power can be allocated to server 1/x(FSM-STAGE:sam:dme:ComputerPhysicalAssociate:CheckPowerAvailability)

The server was powered off at this point so I tried powering it on which went fine although it booted into the UEFI shell rather than the OS on the disk.  In the power control monitor for the chassis I noticed the server was allocated 25W and its oper state was unbudgeted whereas the other servers (all identical) were allocated 550W and set to deployed.  All including the problematic server were running a no-cap power priority.  I came across this Cisco bug report:

https://quickview.cloudapps.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCuy52691

It's for an older version and the symptoms are different since I had no issues powering the server on however I tried the workaround changing the power policy to 5 and everything worked normally again, the server was able to complete its upgrade and booted its OS.  It has changed the maximum power from 550W to 700W for this server in the Power Control monitor.

I'm wondering if this is the same bug I'm seeing and if I should proactively change all the other servers to the same policy setting of 5 instead of no-cap?  The servers have been running for years now without issue so I'm wary of making a change to fix one proble that could cause others.

 

2 Replies 2

jlreich3232
Level 1
Level 1

We just ran into this and found the old article as well. Setting the power cap to 5 also worked for us. Seeing your post kind of helped us move forward with the resolution with a little more confidence that it would resolve the issue.

FIs at 4.2.3m

Servers upgrading to 4.2.3d as a step up to 4.2.3m due to hyperflex compatibility.

I'm glad to hear my post was some help to you and certainly I've not seen any issues with our servers since making the change.  I've upgraded all 16 now and it's strange because some work fine without the power cap setting change and some don't (around half and half), some also seemed to start the upgrade and be working fine then further into the process would stop with the power issue.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card