03-29-2015 10:36 PM - edited 03-01-2019 12:05 PM
Recently I updated Java on my Windows 8 PC from v7 to v8. After that I discovered that I was unable to connect anymore to Cisco UCS Manager due to security reasons (the certificate is not trusted, we can't let you connect to that extremely dangerous site, and even don't ask for it... I hate Java!) I managed to add the IP addresses of Cisco USC Manager and all blade servers management processors to the safe address list (both HTTP and HTTPS), so now I can connect to the USC Manager itself. However, I still can't connect to KVM consoles of blade servers. The console application starts, then says that it's connecting to the server, then just displays the message "Connection failed". That's all.
In the same time I still can connect to a KVM console from another server running Java 7 and Windows Server 2012 RTM.
Is there any way to connect to a server console using Java 8? I'd prefer not to downgrade Java to v7 as it would start complaining again that it's obsolete and must be upgraded. Among other things, it makes more difficult working with other Java-based applications.
Our 6248UP interconnects and B200 M3 servers run firmware 2.2(1d).
03-30-2015 04:56 AM
As you may know this is definitely a Java problem since different versions give different results. Is there any way you can lower the security in Java to medium or add the KVM addresses (at least one for testing purposes) to your list of secure addresses? Let me know...
We are moving away from Java to launch UCSM (UCS Mini is already using HTML5 in its latests version) but we will still use Java for KVM... so have you tried to enable Java logging to see what error message you are getting when it fails to open?
-Kenny
03-30-2015 05:24 AM
I don't know how to lower the security level in Java. There are only two options in the Security tab in Java settings - High (selected by default) and Very High. Is it possible to do it in a configuration file of some kind?
All KVM addresses were added to the secure site list with both HTTP and HTTPS prefix. Still the same error.
If I enable Java console and logging, I receive the same error in the console window:
ProtocolAPCP: CONNECTION_TYPE_SSL_ANONYMOUS
OS: Windows 8
DATE TIME: Connection failed.
03-30-2015 05:47 AM
I forgot to specify I don't use java 8 yet but I am amazed that you dont have "medium" anymore in the sec settings...
We had opened this bug https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCus66699/?reffering_site=dumpcr which was marked as duplicate of https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuo78883/?reffering_site=dumpcr... If you tried the steps in that link and they did not work, I recommend you to open a TAC case and make reference to those two bugs and state you tried what is in there and had no luck, that way we can further investigate what is going on and see if the issue is different and requires further/deeper investigation.
-Kenny
03-30-2015 05:54 AM
Yes, there is no Medium security settings in Java 8 anymore. I still can connect to the UCS Manager by tinkering with secure site list and ticking checkboxes in popup Java warning windows, but KVM is not accessible.
Unfortunately, we have no active SmartNet package, so I can't open a TAC case.
03-30-2015 10:33 AM
then try to ping the KVM IP address and see if it is reachable, this does not seem to be a Java problem, unless you tell me that KVM has never worked.
You can also try from another PC running a different Java version (Java 7 u21 always works for me) and see if the issue is isolated to your PC.
Let me know.
-Kenny
03-30-2015 11:30 PM
All KVM addresses are perfectly reachable from my PC with bot ping and "telnet host 443" commands. I could access all KVMs from my PC before I upgraded Java to v8. The KVMs still can be accessed from another device running Java v7.
03-31-2015 05:25 AM
Are all of your servers M2, M3 or M4 or you have a few of different types?
This seems to ring some bells https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuj76035/?reffering_site=dumpcr but they are fixed on 2.2(1b) & 2.2(2c) you may try to upgrade UCS to 2.2.2c to test if that solves the issue, however, I dont what is easier, upgrade UCS or downgrade Java?
-Kenny
03-31-2015 05:36 AM
Keny, I can't see that bug report due to insufficient access rights. Upgrading the firmware makes sense, but it's not the kind of a procedure I'd like to perform when my servers are inaccessible. So it seems right now I have no other solution but to downgrade Java on my PC.
The current version of firmware is 2.2(3e). Maybe I'll install it in the short run anyways.
03-31-2015 05:42 AM
OK, I thought you had 2.2.1d as that is what you posted in the initial question.. anyways, let us know if you solve the issue, other users will be interested in knowing how this ended up.
-Kenny
03-31-2015 05:55 AM
I mean that the currently AVAILABLE version is 2.2(3e). :) My servers do run 2.2(1d).
I've solved the problem by installing the latest available version of Java v7 and disabling Java v8. Now I can connect to the servers again. Java v7 asks additional questions about the unsecure SSL certificate it receives from the KVM, and after I confirm that I really want to connect it lets the application start. Java v8 doesn't ask those questions, and this must be the reason for its inability to connect.
Java 7 can be downloaded from here: http://java.com/en/download/manual_java7.jsp
03-31-2015 07:39 AM
It would still be nice to try to open a case somehow, so we can investigate further and even see if we can open a bug for the investigation.
Please mark the question as answered so others can see you solved it out. That way someone having the same issue can also try to open a case and get to the root cause.
-Kenny
03-31-2015 10:40 PM
Keny, I can't mark my own reply as an answer, and I know no other way to mark the entire topic as answered.
I'll see if there is a way to open a TAC case but the chances are slim.
08-11-2015 02:40 AM
Evengiy,
Alternatively can you try to install Java7.
Then from the Java Control Panel you can check mark which Java version to use or not.
This might save a lot of unnecessary troubles for you.
Please keep me posted.
Regards,
-SK
08-10-2015 01:51 PM
We are experiencing the same problem. We are on firmware 2.1
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide