09-29-2022 06:08 AM
Hi to all ,
ı am trying to search for the compability between B-series Servers,BladeChasiss and IOMs ,but i am not yet succesffull.
I found the tool (https://ucshcltool.cloudapps.cisco.com/public/) for interoperability ,but cannot found what i am looking for.
My question is, can we add new B-series UCS servers to our old C6508 chasiss .In that old UCS environment we had,2 6248FI and also 2208-IOMS .we have B22m3 ,B200m3 and B200M4 running in this chassis with an old firmware (3.2c)
Thanks alot
Solved! Go to Solution.
09-29-2022 06:39 AM
You have to check the UCS Manager release notes:
TL;DR new M6 can NOT co-exist with M3.
M3 support is removed with UCSM 4.2. (10 year old servers are 10 year old servers)
M6 require Fabric Interconnects 6300+ and UCSM 4.2.
You can add new M5 blades and use UCSM 4.1 with your existing blades.
09-29-2022 06:39 AM
You have to check the UCS Manager release notes:
TL;DR new M6 can NOT co-exist with M3.
M3 support is removed with UCSM 4.2. (10 year old servers are 10 year old servers)
M6 require Fabric Interconnects 6300+ and UCSM 4.2.
You can add new M5 blades and use UCSM 4.1 with your existing blades.
09-29-2022 07:00 AM
thanks Steven
I didint noticed that i had to look ant the Relase notes for compability stuff,
One more question to ask, ıs there any correlation between the IOMS in the Chasiss and the blade servers interoperability ?
thanks
09-29-2022 09:15 AM
Most of this is also scattered in the release notes. I usually ctrl+f for "2208" or whatever part.
The Chassis are NOT end of support (other that UCS X series) (and the guides which state ChassisV1 is EoSale not EoSupport).
The IOMs and FI and blades support combinations are on the table:
Some older releases require intermediate upgrades, but looks like 3.2(3x) can go straight to 4.1(3x):
Wait you said "3.2c" which isn't a version. What is your exact version? 3.2(1x) and 3.2(2x) DO require an intermediate upgrade per the above link.
09-29-2022 11:33 PM
Thanks for all Steven ;
Our old chasiss is in version 3.2(3c) ,
Your help is so good ,again thanks for this.
But for Cisco side, i think this way of searching the devices compability and interoperability is so complicated . ( maybe for me
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: