08-17-2018 11:11 AM
I am new to managing UCS so being as cautious as possible with the prep work. Currently looking to upgrade our UCS infrastructure, B and C-series blades from 2.2(6e) to 3.1(x). I am a little confused about if I need to upgrade everything to 2.2(8) first and then upgrade to 3.1 or if I can go directly from 2.2(6) to 3.1(x). I have heard is both ways. one of the TAC engineers told me I have to upgrade to 2.2(8) first but the 3.1 release notes say I can go directly from 2.2(6) to the 3.1 infrastructure bundle and then upgrade my blades.
Does anyone have an experience going from 2.2(6) to 3.1 or would you recommend going to 2.2(8) first?
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-17-2018 01:05 PM
Thanks for the reply.
"one of the TAC engineers told me I have to upgrade to 2.2(8) first but the 3.1 release notes say I can go directly from 2.2(6) to the 3.1"
This statement confused me, but after reviewing the case notes, I see that everything is correct. Please ensure after upgrading your firmware on the blades that you also confirm/upgrade the drivers to the supported and tested versions per UCS HCL
08-18-2018 12:40 PM
This is the UCS Hardware Compatibility list. It lists the supported driver versions for the hardware components, based on the OS. You can use it to ensure you are on supported firmware for the OS you are running.
08-30-2018 11:12 AM
You can go from any 2.2.X version to any 3.1.X version. You cant go to from 2.2.X to 3.2.X.
08-17-2018 11:26 AM
Going from 2.2.6 to 3.1 does not require a two step upgrade. You can go directly to 3.1
If you are upgrading 2.2.6 to 3.2 you need to go to 2.2.8 first.
If you can share your TAC case number where they told you to conduct a two step upgrade, I will work with the assigned engineer and ensure we are all on the same page and conveying correct information.
08-17-2018 12:46 PM
To be clear, he was recommending going to 3.1 which is what I planned on doing. The case number is 684793991
08-17-2018 12:46 PM
To be clear, he was recommending going to 3.1 which is what I planned on doing. The case number is 684793991
08-17-2018 12:51 PM
We are going to 3.1 because 3.2 does not have Nvidia M10 support
08-17-2018 01:05 PM
Thanks for the reply.
"one of the TAC engineers told me I have to upgrade to 2.2(8) first but the 3.1 release notes say I can go directly from 2.2(6) to the 3.1"
This statement confused me, but after reviewing the case notes, I see that everything is correct. Please ensure after upgrading your firmware on the blades that you also confirm/upgrade the drivers to the supported and tested versions per UCS HCL
08-18-2018 12:37 PM
@Wes Austin wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
Please ensure after upgrading your firmware on the blades that you also confirm/upgrade the drivers to the supported and tested versions per UCS HCL
What is UCS HCL?
08-18-2018 12:40 PM
This is the UCS Hardware Compatibility list. It lists the supported driver versions for the hardware components, based on the OS. You can use it to ensure you are on supported firmware for the OS you are running.
08-30-2018 11:01 AM
Hey can I go from 2.2.6e to 3.1 3j? I am asking because the ticket mentions only going to 3.1(1x) but we would like to go to the 3j or 3f which has the spectre and meltdown fix.
08-30-2018 11:12 AM
You can go from any 2.2.X version to any 3.1.X version. You cant go to from 2.2.X to 3.2.X.
08-20-2019 06:32 AM - edited 08-20-2019 06:37 AM
Actually, you can go from 2.2(8) to 3.2(x) link (as correctly stated in the initial answer)
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide