08-15-2017 09:55 AM - edited 03-01-2019 01:16 PM
Hello
Our current UCS environment is running on version 2.2 (3B) , and I'm looking at getting this upgrade to the latest version, 3.1(3c) .. (need to get onto the HTML interface ...bye bye Java), and I just want to check :-
A) This size of jump , some 34 iterations, is do-able
and
b) Supported by Cisco?
Or would the advice be to go to the latest 2.2 version (8g) then to 3.1(3c)
Any considerations/gotchas I need to be aware off?
Regards
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-15-2017 11:02 AM
Hello,
Yes, the upgrade from 2.2.3b to 3.1.X is supported. I would recommend reviewing all release notes, as there is a lot of deprecated hardware not supported in 3.1.
I would also recommend opening a proactive TAC case so we can review the configuration before the upgrade to ensure no known issues are present that would hinder an upgrade.
08-15-2017 11:02 AM
Hello,
Yes, the upgrade from 2.2.3b to 3.1.X is supported. I would recommend reviewing all release notes, as there is a lot of deprecated hardware not supported in 3.1.
I would also recommend opening a proactive TAC case so we can review the configuration before the upgrade to ensure no known issues are present that would hinder an upgrade.
08-15-2017 12:39 PM
I highly recommend opening a proactive support ticket with them. I had several deployments that had problems upgrading 2.2(3d) to 3.1(3a). The interconnects went to a login prompt where the admin password didn't work. They had to get me do a serial connection to the switch so they could manually load the code on the interconnect. Be sure to have a console cable ready just in case when the switches do their upgrade. TAC was able to upgrade mine fine, but it took a while.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide