Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Just about every bit of our LAN/WAN is Cisco, aside from a 5-year old PacketShaper that sits on our primary Internet connection. It's starting to get a little long in the tooth, and we're looking at replacement options.We need something that provide...
Unity 4.03sr1 integrated with CM3.3.4 and Exchange 2003.We recently changed our recording codec from G711ulaw to GSM 6.10 to save email space and to allow playback on handheld devices.Since the codec swap, users are reporting random clipped voicemail...
We upgraded from 3.1.2c to 3.3.4 (via 3.1.4b and 3.3.2) this past weekend. The media streaming app will not activate on either the primary or the secondary call managers. The service shows to be deactivated on the activation page, and when you activ...
We've found that protocol statistics on our Gen 1 (cat 6509 sup1a) CatOS Layer-3 switches are extremely useful when tracking a virus/worm outbreak. Is there a command on an IOS Layer-3 switch similiar to:sho mls statistics entry ip dst-port 5000Than...
We have a user who's AD account was originally associated with a unity 3.1 server in another site. The user was removed correctly from the 3.1 server, but when we attempt to import the account into the 4.0.3 server in the new site, the import fails ...
I have successfully run CUVA on Vista x64 and Win7 x64, but only when using it with Cisco IP Communicator (software). There doesn't seem to be a CDP driver for any x64 OS.
From what I've seen QPM doesn't have the granularity and Layer 7 capabilities that we're looking for. It looks like we're going to do a try and buy on an SCE1010.
Upgrade on our 110R was successful, and so far, so good performance/functionality-wise. We've been solid for the last week, averaging 43 million plus events per day.In the release notes it's mentioned that restricted models automatically upgrade to ...
It has to be a problem with the VPN client itself, as the previous version did not exhibit this behavior.I've seen the same behavior with 5.0.03.0530 on both Vista (SP1) and Win2k8 server.
A few questions:How big is the link?What type of link is it?How many calls do you typically have up on the link under high utilization?What codec are you using?
