Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Have Smart Licensing configured with 4431's in 16.x. All of the sudden none of our routers (we have MANY) are receiving authorization even though it's been working fine for >1yr.
Have a host entry pointed to 173.37.145.8 (tools.cisco.com) to get aro...
Trying to understand the scale matrix I found below. We are wanting to use EVPN as an L2 replacement. Currently we use VPLS on our 6880's. Our concern is related to the Bridge-Domain limits listed below. Is it true we can only have 225 VLAN's in use ...
Trying to turn off errdisable (don't need an explanation of why errdisable is good, I get it) for a provider loopback scenario that's causing the port to go down. Attempted 'no errdisable detect all' and 'no errdisable detect cause security-violation...
Attempting to configure VxLAN EVPN on a pair of Catalyst 9500-32C's for a Proof of concept. No joy so far. Been referencing these links:
https://community.cisco.com/t5/data-center-blogs/vxlan-evpn-configuration-example-n9k-p2p/ba-p/3663830
https://ww...
We upgraded our switches recently from the 12 train to 150 train. We are now getting this error message on some clients which is forcing us to bypass authentication. Other ports are working just fine. It seems to happen most when users move there lap...
I have heard they are trying to work on a solution for 1GB, but so far it hasn't come to fruition. Although the 9500-32C does support it with a CVR, at this point we've tested 10/100G but 1G doesn't work. We need it for some WAN connections as well, ...
Used 3750, 6880's and 9500s. 9500's support MKA and now 6880's (SY7) do as well (standards based) so provide for migration path to MKA. 9500X will support only MKA and not CTS.
Martin, thanks for the post. Martin, thanks for the post. For the powers that be at Cisco: It's pretty bizarre (more like ugly) that TAC was surprised and unaware until today according to them. As customers this doesn't leave us feeling warm and fu...
Martin, thanks for the post. For the powers that be at Cisco: It's pretty bizarre (more like ugly) that TAC was surprised and unaware until today according to them. As customers this doesn't leave us feeling warm and fuzzy, especially given that it ...
So it looks like this is a brand new bug per TAC. We had to install a new certificate using the
crypto pki trustpool import terminal
command (TAC gave us the cert). After that we ran the
license smart renew auth
and it succeeded. Problem now is we ha...