Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
As I had no luck with the 7965, wondering if this unit - SPA 525G is supported on the SRP-527W modem router.Please note: for the helpful soul who replied to other post, this is NOT a 3rd party system...
Could anyone tell me if this unit is supported on the Cisco SRP527W router/modem?I can register with the SIP provider (info screen in router) but cannot get past "registering" on the phone itself.(need to use wireless broadband, hence the 527 unit).
Client has asked if the UC540 will provide an "intercom" at the front door of his home/office.Now, initially, I thought "No" - it is a PBX, not a doorbell...Easy out is to use an IP Camera with Mic/Spkrs. (He has ordered 525G's, so video monitoring o...
Have deployed a few of these - and am truly frustrated that I cannot see then in the topolgy, let alone actually manage them.Can someone tell me why such a ubiquitous switch is not supported.Even the SmartPort utility is useless - CCA (3.3.1 and earl...
Am facing an install of a UC560, in a site with SBS 2008 resident.ESW switches and SA520W for security.Now, if it is setup correctly (in MS parlance,) The DHCP service is run by the SBS server - and it gets all snitty, if it is turned off.Also, a UC5...
Thanks Steve - you would never know reading the doco on it... Seems weird though? There is a protocol conversion happening from SIP to analog in the SRP, but it cannot re-direct a straight SIP data stream? In essence it is the same as those early AT...
Hi Steve,no PBX...just a single IP phone test to the SRP.at least trying to get a single IP phone to the SRP...direct connectSRP SIP(Voice) module registers with SIP provider.DHCP works.VLAN 100 use for voice (default)phone receives address from SRP...
Yes thanks Leo, also used a 525G and have same issue. Assumed as SRP527 is basically an above average gateway, not a CM, that SIP would be the default?
Am afraid this is another example why I truly believe Cisco are not serious about the SMB space... (hte Board seemes to think they have it covered by buying Linksys...)Not having this driver sounds trivial, until it is time to deploy one/many. Sorry...
