Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About stu_syn
stu_syn
Beginner
Hi all - I've been working with Cisco IPT since day one, as was fortunate enough to be the first person in the UK to unpack an IP phone (I used to work for the collective).
Day-to-day IPT is what I do but I don't seem to get on NetPro as much as I'd like.
Recent Badges
Stats
Member since
10-26-2001
188
Posts
16
Helpful
4
Solutions
Created by
stu_syn
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
09-03-2014
04:31 PM
09-03-2014
04:31 PM
Hi Team, I don't think you can beat real-life experience so I thought I'd ask this team whether they had any recommendations. We need to add some SSDs into our UCS B230s - we have this part code: UCS-SSD100GI1F105= but my team understand this goes EOL later this month. Do you possibly have any recommendation of a part code that you know is a suitable alternative? Many thanks in advance, Stu
... View more
- Tags:
- SSD B230
Labels:
Created by
stu_syn
in IP Telephony and Phones
in IP Telephony and Phones
12-12-2010
12:55 PM
12-12-2010
12:55 PM
Hi Team, I'm stuck on something and would be very grateful if you can help? We've configured remote voicemail systems many times using VG30Ds, and a gateway backhauled to CUCM using MGCP, all of which work fine. However, I've now got a scenario where I need to use the same situation but using H.323 instead of MGCP. My question is, can I get MWI to work when H.323 is used instead of MGCP backhaul? So to confirm, the topology is as follows: [DPNSS VM] <--(DPNSS)--> [VG30D] <--Q.SIG--> [GW] <-- H.323--> [CUCM 7.1] Again, your help massively appreciated, Cheers, Stu
... View more
Labels:
01-21-2010
02:20 PM
Hi Jonathan, Thanks for the reply; there's no difference in the CUCIMOC setup - am I to assume the LDAP profile is part of the MOC setup? Cheers, Stu
... View more
01-21-2010
11:04 AM
Yeah I would have thought so, but no..... there's no specific registry key for port. Even with the setting: LDAP_Server_1 of "ldap://10.249.1.7:389" it still shows "disconnected" with port 386. It's all very bizarre.
... View more
Created by
stu_syn
in IP Telephony and Phones
in IP Telephony and Phones
01-21-2010
10:34 AM
01-21-2010
10:34 AM
Thank you, Could be (they don't tell us) Would you happen to know which is which? It makes more sense that CUCIMOC would show 'on the phone' if it was possible to configure?
... View more
01-21-2010
10:26 AM
Another CUCIMOC question if I may: On some users, if they make a call they go to OCS status "on the phone". On others, if they make a call they go to "busy". A communicator to communicator call always appears "on the phone". Does anyone have any idea what the difference might be? Thanks in advance, Stu
... View more
Labels:
01-21-2010
10:21 AM
Hi People, We're setting up CUCIMOC and, on the whole, everything is going well. Unfortunately a few devices are not behaving properly. One PC is showing disconnected to LDAP with the following Server Status: LDAP: Server Address: 10.249.1.7 Server Port: 386 Server Protocol: ldap Status: Disconnected I'm expecting the server port to be 389 and not 386; but I can't see where this is configured? Can you confirm if this is a typo on a registry setting or is it something the OCS guys have setup or misconfigured. Other PCs are setup with port 389 and working fine. Cheers, Stu
... View more
Labels:
10-01-2009
09:50 AM
I am trying to add background images to IP phones on CUCM 4.1(3). I note the following documents which contain all of the info: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/7961g_7961g-ge_7941g_7941g-ge/4_1_3/english/administration/guide/7961cus.html HOWEVER, I am using 7940/7960s. Can anyone confirm whether the file formats are the same or, if they're different, what the correct requirements are. Everything much appreciated... Cheers, Stu
... View more
Labels:
07-27-2009
01:06 AM
Samuel, That's a slightly different problem. Mine registers fine over the LAN. You set the parameters via registry setting using gpedit.msc, the installations instructions should tell you what you need, but if you get stuck - let me know. Cheers, Stu
... View more
07-24-2009
02:48 AM
Or.... simple method... put the call on hold, and he can resume it. It depends how close you are to the other party.
... View more
07-23-2009
07:38 AM
It's CUCM 7.1(2) with the inbuilt CSF option It seems fairly fundamental as CUCM doesn't think the SIP device is registered. Cheers, Stu
... View more
07-23-2009
04:50 AM
Thanks for your help Michael, Softphone mode..... the client thinks it registered but CUCM says "unregistered". You can attempt to make a call but nothing happens.... no response at all. Interestingly if you use it as Deskphone control mode with IP Communicator it works fine.... bizarre. I know we could use phone proxy on the ASA but all of our clients use VPN. Cheers, Stu
... View more
07-23-2009
04:04 AM
Hi All, We run IP Communicator over a VPN client as a matter of course but, as an OCS user, we're trialling CUCIMOC. Whilst it registers fine we can't seem to setup a call through the VPN.... i can't see anything in the release notes, so any ideas? Cheers, Stu
... View more
Labels:
07-17-2009
01:29 AM
Hi, It's really nice and simple, so nothing to worry about. The info you need is here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucmbe/admin/7_0_1/ccmcfg/b06trunk.html There is no difference between CUCM and CUCMBE in this instance and the fact that they are different versions shouldn't give you any issue with respect to how it's configured. Use an intercluster trunk for this task. Good luck, Cheers, Stu
... View more
Created by
stu_syn
in IP Telephony and Phones
in IP Telephony and Phones
07-15-2009
04:39 AM
07-15-2009
04:39 AM
Hi Teresa, Sorry, I should have said this is a CUCM solution and not 'Express' Cheers, Stu
... View more
Created by
stu_syn
in Unified Communications Infrastructure
09-06-2016
09-06-2016
Hi All, And thank you in advance.... We have a legacy H.323 Tandberg
device (not connected through a...
Created by
stu_syn
in Unified Communications Infrastructure
09-06-2016
09-06-2016
Hi All, And thank you in advance.... We have a legacy H.323 Tandberg
device (not connected through a...
Created by
stu_syn
in Unified Computing System Discussions
09-03-2014
09-03-2014
Hi Team,I don't think you can beat real-life experience so I thought I'd
ask this team whether they ...
Created by
stu_syn
in Unified Communications Infrastructure
06-20-2012
06-20-2012
Hi Everyone,I'd be grateful if you could lend me your experience to the
following scenario.We have p...
Created by
stu_syn
in IP Telephony and Phones
12-12-2010
12-12-2010
Hi Team,I'm stuck on something and would be very grateful if you can
help?We've configured remote vo...
Created by
stu_syn
in Unified Communications Infrastructure
09-09-2010
09-09-2010
Hello Carsten (and Hi Bryan),This one is easily missed - but luckily
easily solved too.So yes you've...
Created by
stu_syn
in Unified Communications Infrastructure
08-25-2010
08-25-2010
This email has been scanned for all viruses.Please consider the
environment before printing this ema...
08-18-2010
Hi All,Apologies to reiterate the question but I think there are many of
us out here who are needing...
08-17-2010
Good question Dave,Other than having to emulate separate machines, is
there really no way of demonst...
06-30-2010
Hi Michael,It's June the 30th!!!Any word please? We're seriously under
pressure from the customers w...
01-21-2010
Hi Jonathan,Thanks for the reply; there's no difference in the CUCIMOC
setup - am I to assume the LD...
01-21-2010
Yeah I would have thought so, but no..... there's no specific registry
key for port.Even with the se...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 10-26-2001 04:46 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 08-15-2018 02:19 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 188 |
| Total Helpful Votes Received | 16 |
Helpful Votes Given To
