Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I am trying to setup a SG220-28 to support a 2504 Wireless Access Controller and what will end up being 4 Aironet 1702i WAPs.
At another location, I have observed a SG300 switch with access points (different than those above) attached to a trunk port...
My client is looking to replace their ASA5505 with an ASA5506-x along with upgrading their Internet connection. They are currently on a 25/25Mbps connection with the 5505 and are looking to upgrade to either 100/100 or 150/150.
The existing configura...
I'm familiar, when working on router IOS, and modifying the ACL on the WAN, the ACL must be removed from the WAN (no ip access-croup...).When working on a PIX via SSH, I'm assuming some similar technique is needed.Is there some documentation on how t...
We have several Cisco routers in a hub/spoke setup (831s as spokes to a 1721 hub) with successfully established tunnels.NAT translations are working (RDP from Internet to public IP tranlates OK and allows connection) with no issue.All traffic is pass...
Is it possible to allow traffic to come into the WAN port from an unencrypted source (such as SMTP or RDP to our server from the Internet), as well as from an encrypted source (SMTP/RDP from a client on the remote side of a LAN-to-LAN VPN).Our router...
Just wanted to say in 2019, this just helped us solve a major problem we were having with the exact same issue. We had spent HOURS with TAC on this. Never got past the fact-finding phase
I have it set as Trunk, but assumed I had to set tagged to both VLANs (per my observation on a SG300).
VLAN is our 'business' LAN. I'll set it there.
The WAPs need access to both VLANs, for both business and public access.
Will give this a try later...
Is there a more complete write or documentation on this?I tried fitting this to our situation but traffic still does not pass.We are trying to pass traffic for a host that has a public static NAT through a LAN-to-LAN VPN.
Thanks. We already have been able to successfully use SSH to get to the PIX.My question is, when I start modifying the ACL on the WAN, will that terminate my SSH session?
Yes. If you refer to my original message RDP will pass over the VPN in the case where we do not have an external (public) IP address translation in place: 'RDP to a non-NAT translated host (LAN A private IP to hub LAN private IP) works well.'
