Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About vanderwaalr
Stats
Member since
10-25-2001
16
Posts
0
Helpful
0
Solutions
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
10-10-2011
03:38 PM
10-10-2011
03:38 PM
Hi, I have a wireless deployment consisting of 2 WLC's centrally located in two data centres, with WCS managing the WLC's. There are currently two sites with wireless. Each site is it's own AP Group with different SSIDs at both sites. The site where I am having an issue with H-REAP has 48 AP's installed across a number of floors. The problem I am experiencing is that when clients get associated to one specific AP , they will successfully connect to the SSID, but are getting dropped into the native VLAN (VLAN 23) instead of the VLAN (VLAN 22) that is mapped to the SSID. The clients get an IP address from the native VLAN and can access the corporate network, but due to firewall rules they cannot get access to some key corporate assets, as the native VLAN (VLAN 23) is not included in a specific firewall group for wireless clients. Clients connected to the same SSID but on a different AP are getting dropped into the correct VLAN (VLAN 22). The switchport configuration for the one AP that is having issues is specifically below: interface GigabitEthernet5/47 description *** Wireless AP *** switchport access vlan 23 switchport trunk native vlan 23 switchport trunk allowed vlan 22,23 switchport mode trunk spanning-tree portfast trunk spanning-tree bpduguard enable spanning-tree guard root ! However, this configuration is the same across all AP connected switchports. The switchport is trunking correctly: show int gi5/47 trunk Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan Gi5/47 on 802.1q trunking 23 Port Vlans allowed on trunk Gi5/47 22-23 Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain Gi5/47 22-23 Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned Gi5/47 22-23 I have attached a screenshot of the AP configuration from WCS. As can be seen, the AP is configured for H-REAP, with the Native VLAN set, and the SSID-to-VLAN mappings also set. I have tried doing a configuration reset on this AP and re-configuring it from scratch, but it still exhibits the same behaviour. Does anyone have any ideas on what I can do to resolve this problem? Thanks in advance.
... View more
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Network Management
in Network Management
10-02-2011
03:37 PM
10-02-2011
03:37 PM
Thanks for the prompt response. Ideally I was hoping for a fix, but I guess I will have to wait until the patch is released.
... View more
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Network Management
in Network Management
09-28-2011
11:44 PM
09-28-2011
11:44 PM
I have an LMS 4.0.1 server (on Windows 2008 R2) with all the LMS and device updates applied that fails when trying to do an Inventory Collection on a Cisco 3925E router. The router is running IOS Version 15.1(1)T2. This device is apparently supported according to: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/ciscoworks_lan_management_solution/4.0/device_support/table/lms40sdt.html Some 'show ver' info: Cisco IOS Software, C3900e Software (C3900e-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1(1)T2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.1(1r)T2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) System image file is "flash0:c3900e-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-1.T2.bin" Cisco CISCO3925-CHASSIS (revision 1.0) with C3900-SPE200/K9 with 689152K/293888K bytes of memory. 'show inv': NAME: "CISCO3925-CHASSIS", DESCR: "CISCO3925-CHASSIS" PID: CISCO3925-CHASSIS , VID: V02, SN: FGL152610R8 NAME: "Cisco Services Performance Engine 200 for Cisco 3900 ISR on Slot 0", DESCR: "Cisco Services Performance Engine 200 for Cisco 3900 ISR" PID: C3900-SPE200/K9 , VID: V02 , SN: FOC151828UX NAME: "WAN Interface Card - HWIC Serial 1T on Slot 0 SubSlot 0", DESCR: "WAN Interface Card - HWIC Serial 1T" PID: HWIC-1T , VID: V04 , SN: FOC15170VRL NAME: "C3900 AC-POE Power Supply 1", DESCR: "C3900 AC-POE Power Supply 1" PID: PWR-3900-POE , VID: V02, SN: SNI1503C7AV NAME: "C3900 AC Power Supply 2", DESCR: "C3900 AC Power Supply 2" PID: PWR-3900-AC , VID: V03, SN: SNI1521C825 For reference, here is the SNMP configuration on the 3925: snmp-server group ADMIN v3 auth snmp-server community <rostring> RO snmp-server ifindex persist snmp-server ip precedence 2 snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkdown linkup coldstart warmstart snmp-server enable traps tty snmp-server enable traps ospf state-change snmp-server enable traps ospf errors snmp-server enable traps ospf retransmit snmp-server enable traps ospf lsa snmp-server enable traps ospf cisco-specific state-change nssa-trans-change snmp-server enable traps ospf cisco-specific state-change shamlink interface-old snmp-server enable traps ospf cisco-specific state-change shamlink neighbor snmp-server enable traps ospf cisco-specific errors snmp-server enable traps ospf cisco-specific retransmit snmp-server enable traps ospf cisco-specific lsa snmp-server enable traps flash insertion removal snmp-server enable traps envmon fan shutdown supply temperature status snmp-server enable traps bgp snmp-server enable traps memory bufferpeak snmp-server enable traps config-copy snmp-server enable traps config snmp-server enable traps entity snmp-server enable traps event-manager snmp-server enable traps cpu threshold snmp-server enable traps syslog snmp-server enable traps vtp snmp-server enable traps ipsla snmp-server enable traps bulkstat collection transfer snmp-server host 10.152.1.27 version 2c <rostring> The specific error message captured from the IC_Server.log file: [ Thu Sep 29 16:19:55 EST 2011 ],ERROR,[Thread-23],com.cisco.nm.rmeng.inventory.ics.core.CollectionController,1075,Exception for device 172.22.41.9 is java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor24.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at com.cisco.nm.rmeng.inventory.ics.core.CollectionController.run(CollectionController.java:1065) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) Caused by: com.cisco.nm.xms.xdi.ags.system.CollectionFailed: java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: 2 at com.cisco.nm.xms.xdi.pkgs.LibInventory.EnergyWise_HelperMethods.getDeviceEnergyWise(EnergyWise_HelperMethods.java:77) at com.cisco.nm.xms.xdi.pkgs.SharedInventoryCatIOS.EnergyWiseAGI_ENERGYWISE_Mib.g$eval(EnergyWiseAGI_ENERGYWISE_Mib.java:51) at com.cisco.nm.xms.xdi.ags.EnergyWiseAGI.g$eval(EnergyWiseAGI.java:21) at com.cisco.nm.xms.xdi.SdiEngine.initAndEvalAGIs(SdiEngine.java:383) at com.cisco.nm.xms.xdi.SdiEngine.request(SdiEngine.java:309) at com.cisco.nm.xms.xdi.SdiEngine.getDevRepr(SdiEngine.java:302) at com.cisco.nm.rmeng.inventory.ics.core.CollectionController.run(CollectionController.java:687) ... 1 more [ Thu Sep 29 16:19:55 EST 2011 ],ERROR,[Thread-23],com.cisco.nm.rmeng.inventory.ics.core.CollectionController,1107, Collection failed for the device : 19 com.cisco.nm.xms.xdi.ags.system.CollectionFailed: java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: 2 at com.cisco.nm.xms.xdi.pkgs.LibInventory.EnergyWise_HelperMethods.getDeviceEnergyWise(EnergyWise_HelperMethods.java:77) at com.cisco.nm.xms.xdi.pkgs.SharedInventoryCatIOS.EnergyWiseAGI_ENERGYWISE_Mib.g$eval(EnergyWiseAGI_ENERGYWISE_Mib.java:51) at com.cisco.nm.xms.xdi.ags.EnergyWiseAGI.g$eval(EnergyWiseAGI.java:21) at com.cisco.nm.xms.xdi.SdiEngine.initAndEvalAGIs(SdiEngine.java:383) at com.cisco.nm.xms.xdi.SdiEngine.request(SdiEngine.java:309) at com.cisco.nm.xms.xdi.SdiEngine.getDevRepr(SdiEngine.java:302) at com.cisco.nm.rmeng.inventory.ics.core.CollectionController.run(CollectionController.java:687) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) I have attached a more detailed output from the IC_Server.log file for the Inventory Collection job of the device. The error at first glance appears to be related to EnergyWise, so I even tried creating an SNMP view that excludes the EnergyWise MIB with the following configuration: snmp-server view EXCLUDE-ENERYGYWISE-MIB iso included snmp-server view EXCLUDE-ENERYGYWISE-MIB ciscoEnergywiseMIB excluded snmp-server community L1ghty3@rSnmp$ view EXCLUDE-ENERYGYWISE-MIB RO snmp-server group ADMIN v3 auth read EXCLUDE-ENERYGYWISE-MIB But that didn't seem to fix it, the Inventory Collection still fails. (Perhaps this configuration is incorrect?). Has anyone experienced any issues like this? I have tried everything I can think of to fix this, and have trawled through the support forums but couldn't find anything.
... View more
- Tags:
- 3900
- 3925
- 3925e
- 4.0.1
- ciscoworks
- collection
- device
- energywise
- inventory
- lms
- lms4.0
- mib
- router
- snmp
- troubleshoot
Labels:
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
09-08-2011
06:02 PM
09-08-2011
06:02 PM
Just to follow up for others out there. In the end I had to remove the new WLAN/SSID mapping in the AP Groups section and then re-add it. As soon as I did that, the SSID started broadcasting again.
... View more
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
09-08-2011
05:34 PM
09-08-2011
05:34 PM
OK, thanks. I guess it must be a configuration issue. I'll go investigate.
... View more
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
09-08-2011
05:27 PM
09-08-2011
05:27 PM
Surendra, Thanks for the response. So the maximum number fo 16 doesn't matter if H-REAP mode is enabled or not, regardless of the AP and/or SSID mode, the maximum WLANs/SSIDs on an AP is 16? For some reason I thought there was a limit on the number of SSIDs that could be enabled on an AP when the AP is in H-REAP mode. Thanks.
... View more
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
09-08-2011
04:17 PM
09-08-2011
04:17 PM
Hi, What is the maximum number of WLANs/SSIDs that can be configured on a H-REAP access point? I have a network with 3502i AP's, centralised WLC's in the data centre running 7.0.116.0, and WCS version 7.0.172.0. I was successfully running 2 SSID's at a remote site, one SSID was configured for H-REAP local switching, dropping out to the local site VLAN X, and the other SSID was a central switching guest WLAN anchored to a WLC in a DMZ. I configured a third SSID at the local site running H-REAP local switching, and now I cannot see the guest SSID anymore, it does not appear to be broadcasting. Is there a maximum of 2 WLANs/SSIDs when operating in H-REAP mode? The SSID's are configured as follows: H-REAP SSID #1 is WPA2 AES 802.1x H-REAP SSID #2 is WPA2 AES 802.1x Guest SSID is WPA2 PSK + Layer 3 Web Authentication Thanks.
... View more
05-31-2010
04:54 AM
I have a client that is experiencing issues with the Nexus 5000 switches and vPC configuration. They have a pair of Dell servers each with dual port Emulex CNA's installed. When the server(s) are single homed to one Nexus 5000, using bandwidth throughput testing tools they see a sustained averaged throughput between the two servers of around the 9-9.5Gbps mark. However, when they connect the server to both Nexus 5000's in a vPC configuration, the server throughput seems to drop down to around the 6-6.5Gbps mark. The next odd thing is if one of the ports participating in the vPC is shutdown (or the interface is disconnected), the throughput almost immediately ramps up to the 9-9.5Gbps mark. Then if the port/interface is re-established, the throughput drops back down to 6-6.5Gbps. The Emulex software was used to create a static (no LACP) network team with Destination IP load balancing, although for the throughput tests only a connection between 2 servers was used so the traffic should be sent to/from the same interface for every packet. The relavant parts of the Nexus 5000's configurations is below: Nexus #1: version 4.1(3)N1(1) feature vpc vpc domain 1 peer-keepalive destination 192.168.77.6 vrf context management ip route 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.77.1 spanning-tree vlan 1-3967,4048-4093 priority 4096 interface port-channel27 switchport mode trunk switchport access vlan 400 switchport trunk native vlan 400 vpc 27 spanning-tree link-type point-to-point spanning-tree port type edge trunk spanning-tree guard loop speed 10000 interface port-channel28 switchport mode trunk switchport access vlan 400 switchport trunk native vlan 400 vpc 28 spanning-tree link-type point-to-point spanning-tree port type edge trunk spanning-tree guard loop speed 10000 interface port-channel100 switchport mode trunk vpc peer-link spanning-tree port type network speed 10000 interface Ethernet1/9 description To Nexus 5020 (vPC Peer Keepalive Link) switchport mode trunk interface Ethernet1/27 switchport mode trunk switchport access vlan 400 switchport trunk native vlan 400 spanning-tree link-type point-to-point spanning-tree port type edge trunk spanning-tree guard loop channel-group 27 interface Ethernet1/28 switchport mode trunk switchport access vlan 400 switchport trunk native vlan 400 spanning-tree link-type point-to-point spanning-tree port type edge trunk spanning-tree guard loop channel-group 28 interface Ethernet1/33 description To Nexus 5020 (vPC Peer Link) switchport mode trunk channel-group 100 interface Ethernet1/34 description To Nexus 5020 (vPC Peer Link) switchport mode trunk channel-group 100 interface Ethernet1/35 description To Nexus 5020 (vPC Peer Link) switchport mode trunk channel-group 100 interface Ethernet1/36 description To Nexus 5020 (vPC Peer Link) switchport mode trunk channel-group 100 interface mgmt0 ip address 192.168.77.5/25 cfs ipv4 distribute cfs eth distribute Nexus #2: version 4.1(3)N1(1) feature vpc vpc domain 1 peer-keepalive destination 192.168.77.5 vrf context management ip route 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.77.1 spanning-tree vlan 1-3967,4048-4093 priority 8192 interface port-channel27 switchport mode trunk switchport access vlan 400 switchport trunk native vlan 400 vpc 27 spanning-tree link-type point-to-point spanning-tree port type edge trunk spanning-tree guard loop speed 10000 interface port-channel28 switchport mode trunk switchport access vlan 400 switchport trunk native vlan 400 vpc 28 spanning-tree link-type point-to-point spanning-tree port type edge trunk spanning-tree guard loop speed 10000 interface port-channel100 switchport mode trunk vpc peer-link spanning-tree port type network speed 10000 interface Ethernet1/9 description To Nexus 5020 (vPC Peer Keepalive Link) switchport mode trunk interface Ethernet1/27 switchport mode trunk switchport access vlan 400 switchport trunk native vlan 400 spanning-tree link-type point-to-point spanning-tree port type edge trunk spanning-tree guard loop channel-group 27 interface Ethernet1/28 switchport mode trunk switchport access vlan 400 switchport trunk native vlan 400 spanning-tree link-type point-to-point spanning-tree port type edge trunk spanning-tree guard loop channel-group 28 interface Ethernet1/33 description To Nexus 5020 (vPC Peer Link) switchport mode trunk channel-group 100 interface Ethernet1/34 description To Nexus 5020 (vPC Peer Link) switchport mode trunk channel-group 100 interface Ethernet1/35 description To Nexus 5020 (vPC Peer Link) switchport mode trunk channel-group 100 interface Ethernet1/36 description To Nexus 5020 (vPC Peer Link) switchport mode trunk channel-group 100 interface mgmt0 ip address 192.168.77.6/25 cfs ipv4 distribute cfs eth distribute Server #1 is connected to Ports 27 on both Nexus 5000's, and Server #2 is connected to Port's 28 on both Nexus 5000's. We have not, as yet, tested this all using LACP for negotiation of the virtual Port-Channels. Can anyone suggest any ideas on what may be wrong or what we should look at? Is the vPC configuration all correct? Thanks in advance.
... View more
Labels:
Re: H-REAP AP with Web Passthrough laye...
in Wireless Security and Network Management
02-01-2010
03:02 PM
02-01-2010
03:02 PM
I have managed to get this working. It turns out that it was partially my laptop playing games on me and not properly associating to the SSID's.
... View more
12-22-2009
01:48 PM
Thanks for your response. I should have mentioned this in my first post, but the Loopback addresses are all reachable within the managed WAN. This was the first thing I tested. 'Router-H' can ping the loopback addresses of both 'Router-G' and 'Router-A', and vice-versa. We have also tried reducing the MTU size down to 1476 but this did not seem to fix the issues, the tunnels still dropped after an hour or so. One comment worth making is that when I do a 'show interface tunnel 1' the MTU size reported in the output is 17916, even though we have manually configured 'ip mtu 1500'. We are using keepalive to ensure the GRE tunnels are tracked on both ends of the Tunnel. Lastly, we have tried using Fa0/1 as the tunnel source but again this did not fix the problem.
... View more
12-21-2009
09:59 PM
Hi, I have a problem relating to GRE connectivity that I just can't pinpoint the cause of. I have a customer with 3 sites that currently connect in a hub-and-spoke fashion. Site 'H' is the hub site with sites 'A' and 'G' connecting to 'H' via 9.6kbps serial links. The network connections are only used for control systems and therefor high bandwidth is not essential. See diagram 'design1.jpg' below: 'Router-H' is a Cisco 2811 router, while 'Router-G' and 'Router-A' are both Cisco 1841 routers. 'Router-H' is running Advanced IP Services 12.4(22)YB4 and 'Router-G' and 'Router-A' are both running IP Base 12.4(22)YB4. This version of IOS is currently used because it is a requirement to support the HWIC-3G-GSM cards installed in all 3 routers, which will be used as part of a later project. The network is being migrated away from the serial links to a managed WAN with copper ethernet handoff. The managed WAN is run by a different business unit and does not route RFC1918 addressing through the WAN. As such, we are configuring a set of GRE tunnels in a hub-and-spoke fashion (basically providing the same connectivity the legacy serial links do) between the 3 sites. Again, 'Router-H' is the hub router with 2 GRE tunnels configured to both 'Router-G' and 'Router-A'. See diagram 'design2.jpg' below: When the GRE tunnels were first configured, they all came up and had IP connectivity running across both tunnels. The problem was experienced a few hours after the tunnels were configured, where they just dropped off and went into a 'down' state for no known reason (we have keepalives configured across both GRE tunnels). For some reason, the tunnels would not re-establish connectivity and return to an 'up' state. In an attempt to re-establish tunnel connectivity, we issued a 'shut' and 'no shut' on the tunnel interfaces at both ends of the tunnels, but with no success. After some fiddling around, we found the only way to restore tunnel connectivity was to basically erase the tunnel configuration at both ends ('no int tunnel 1', 'no int tunnel 2') and then re-apply the configuration. After re-applying the configuration from scratch the tunnels all re-established. However, again, after a few hours the tunnels dropped for no apparent reason and the only way to get them to re-establish was to repeat the process of erasing the tunnel configurations and re-applying. This is continually happening so we have been forced to restore the legacy serial links until we can resolve the GRE connectivity issues. The GRE configuration is pretty straight forward: 'Router-H' configuration: interface Loopback0 ip address 134.xxx.zzz.131 255.255.255.255 no ip redirects no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp ! interface Tunnel1 description Tunnel to Router-A ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.240 ip mtu 1500 keepalive 10 3 tunnel source Loopback0 tunnel destination 134.xxx.zzz.130 ! interface Tunnel2 description Tunnel to Router-G ip address 10.10.20.1 255.255.255.240 ip mtu 1500 keepalive 10 3 tunnel source Loopback0 tunnel destination 134.xxx.zzz.129 ! interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 134.xxx.yy.90 255.255.255.252 duplex auto speed auto ! 'Router-G' configuration: interface Loopback0 ip address 134.xxx.zzz.129 255.255.255.255 no ip redirects no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp ! interface Tunnel1 description Tunnel to Hastings ip address 10.10.20.2 255.255.255.240 ip mtu 1500 keepalive 10 3 tunnel source Loopback0 tunnel destination 134.xxx.zzz.131 ! interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 134.xxx.yy.86 255.255.255.252 duplex auto speed auto ! 'Router-A' configuration: interface Loopback0 ip address 134.xxx.zzz.130 255.255.255.255 no ip redirects no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp ! interface Tunnel1 description Tunnel to Hastings ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.240 ip mtu 1500 keepalive 10 3 tunnel source Loopback0 tunnel destination 134.xxx.zzz.131 ! interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 134.xxx.yy.82 255.255.255.252 duplex auto speed auto ! At one point we thought it was a connectivity issue with the managed WAN but the fact that the GRE tunnels do establish when you first apply the configuration has led us away from this thinking at this stage. Another train of thought is that it is a bug of some sort, but we have tested running GRE tunnels over the serial links on the same hardware and this works fine, so we are not focusing our attention on this train of thought. Unfortunately we do not have configuration access to the managed WAN but do have access to an Engineer who supports the managed WAN. Has anyone out there experienced issues like this, or can anyone offer any suggestions/thoughts on where we should look..? All reports from the managed WAN engineer are that there is no access-list filtering in the WAN blocking GRE connectivity. ICMP ping connectivity is also not blocked. Thanks in advance.
... View more
Labels:
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
01-15-2009
06:35 PM
01-15-2009
06:35 PM
Thanks. I suspected this would be the case, but couldn't find anywhere to confirm it. Does the default configuration that it boots up with come with an IP address configured? Or configured for DHCP?
... View more
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Application Networking
in Application Networking
06-14-2006
11:37 PM
06-14-2006
11:37 PM
Gilles, Thanks for the reply. On another site I was looking at rolling out a Catalyst 6500 CSM module to do the exact same thing as the site I have the CSS11501's at, but it too does not support IPv6 from all I could find. Does the ACE provide all the functionality of the CSM plus IPv6? Thanks. Richard.
... View more
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Application Networking
in Application Networking
06-14-2006
06:56 PM
06-14-2006
06:56 PM
Hi, I'm new to content networking and load-balancing. I am setting up a new nameserver network site and have the following equipment: - Cisco 2811 - Cicso CSS11501 - Cisco Catalyst 2960 This site will have 2 nameservers which I want to load-balance behind the CSS11501. The network will be setup like this: Internet | Cisco 2811 | CSS11501 | Cisco 2960 | Nameservers 1 & 2 The CSS11501 will be in routed mode and will have a publicly addressed VIP (eg, 203.x.x.x) for the DNS service and the name servers will be privately addressed (eg, 10.x.x.10 & 10.x.x.11). I'm hoping this will work fine and serve the requested IPv4 DNS requests. I would like the nameservers to also operate on IPv6 and serve out IPv6 DNS requests but am not sure the CSS11501 can perform IPv6 service load-balancing. My question is, does the CSS11501 support IPv6, load-balancing IPv6 service requests? Thanks in advance. Richard.
... View more
Labels:
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Other Network Architecture Subjects
in Other Network Architecture Subjects
10-25-2001
07:29 PM
10-25-2001
07:29 PM
Hi, We was in a similar situation. Although we are running CW2000 on Solaris. We were originally running it on a SPARC 275Mhz with 512Meg RAM. It was running very slow, so we purchased a new server (SPARC-II 450Mhz 1GIG RAM) and now it is running alot faster than it was on the SPARC 275. It still takes a little bit of time to bring up some screens, but I think that is just a java issue. Java isnt the fastest platform/application around.
... View more
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
10-10-2011
10-10-2011
Hi,I have a wireless deployment consisting of 2 WLC's centrally located
in two data centres, with WC...
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Network Management
10-02-2011
10-02-2011
Thanks for the prompt response. Ideally I was hoping for a fix, but I
guess I will have to wait unti...
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Network Management
09-28-2011
09-28-2011
I have an LMS 4.0.1 server (on Windows 2008 R2) with all the LMS and
device updates applied that fai...
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
09-08-2011
09-08-2011
Just to follow up for others out there.In the end I had to remove the
new WLAN/SSID mapping in the A...
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
09-08-2011
09-08-2011
OK, thanks. I guess it must be a configuration issue. I'll go
investigate.
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
09-08-2011
09-08-2011
Surendra,Thanks for the response. So the maximum number fo 16 doesn't
matter if H-REAP mode is enabl...
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
09-08-2011
09-08-2011
Hi,What is the maximum number of WLANs/SSIDs that can be configured on a
H-REAP access point?I have ...
05-31-2010
I have a client that is experiencing issues with the Nexus 5000 switches
and vPC configuration. They...
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Wireless Security and Network Management
02-01-2010
02-01-2010
I have managed to get this working.It turns out that it was partially my
laptop playing games on me ...
12-22-2009
Thanks for your response.I should have mentioned this in my first post,
but the Loopback addresses a...
12-21-2009
Hi,I have a problem relating to GRE connectivity that I just can't
pinpoint the cause of.I have a cu...
01-15-2009
Thanks. I suspected this would be the case, but couldn't find anywhere
to confirm it.Does the defaul...
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Application Networking
06-14-2006
06-14-2006
Gilles,Thanks for the reply.On another site I was looking at rolling out
a Catalyst 6500 CSM module ...
06-14-2006
Hi,I'm new to content networking and load-balancing.I am setting up a
new nameserver network site an...
Created by
vanderwaalr
in Other Network Architecture Subjects
10-25-2001
10-25-2001
Hi,We was in a similar situation. Although we are running CW2000 on
Solaris. We were originally runn...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 10-25-2001 07:25 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 08-18-2017 04:00 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 16 |
.jpg "Hall of Fame Community Legend"){kind=icon}
