Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello guys!I'm facing an issue that is really awkward related to DHCP IPv4 serving through a 9200L stackpile that acts like a L3 CORE.Intermittently a device takes a lot of time to get an IP or even times out and stay at 169.x.x.x, demanding a reconn...
Hello Guys!Having issues with intermittent internet services connectivity, and if I change outgoing link (there are two links of different providers) it works for a while but then it starts again.All that I have from logs is this:Nov 2 06:10:02.420: ...
First of all I'd like to say that I found other topics here in this forum with same error message, but unfortunately none of the answers helped me.I'm raising a new vWLC 8.10.183 with a bunch of 28xx, 27xx, 9130 and 9120, but I'm getting continuosly ...
Hi There,not sure it this is the right place.. We have configured the Netflow on a uplink interface of N7K to Datacenter to have some visibility on Solarwinds, but there are almost no traffic on SolarWinds (and that's not possible).So we made a test ...
Hi all, I'm creating a project where that building will be full wi-fi. In order to determine how many access point I need,b I'm assuming 8 Mbps per user. But, I need to know what's the throughput of this ap to finish this math. I've already tried to ...
- is the server interface really a trunk port? What vlans are carried by that trunk?It is a VMWare host with multiple VMs, so it carries a trunk all. DHCP server is sitting on vlan 601.- you indicate that vlan 604 is one where you experience the issu...
- why the request for so many ports "Received request to allocate 1024 ports for address X.X.X.X, start_port 5062 end_port 65000"This is my main question too... By the message it looks like someone is trying to allocate a wide range of ports, but I t...
No because they are running production now, trying to avoid impacts.But I'm pretty sure that clearing the NAT table would probably work and would serve as a workaround solution.
