Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi all,
Does anyone have any information regarding what Cisco equipment will eventually replace the C2960X when it goes EOL? Like most of you, we have several thousand 2960X deployed on our networks and several large scale deployments planned in th...
Hi,We're in the process of testing a number of ASR9001 (IOS-XR 5.1.2) that will serve as replacement route-reflectors, however we've been having the hardest time identifying the correct MIB OID values for SNMP monitoring via Nagios.We have downloaded...
Hi all, we've been using RTBH internally for years now and we'd like to begin offering our client's the possibility of blackballing their own routes using a specific community. We've already done this on our Juniper PE and it works like a charm, how...
Hi,With IOS-XR, what would be the simplest way to implement a policier that would rate-limit the amount of ICMP traffic coming into a specific router interface from untrusted IPs (IPv4/IPv6) to a configurable threshold -- 2M for exampl, however allow...
Hi all,We're run into an interoperability problem between Cisco and Juniper that seems insurmountable at this time which I'm hoping that someone else has encountered and, potentially, identified a workaround for. In short, we have 4 route-reflector...
Fixed. An outbound route-map from the PE to the RR was required in order to reset (again) the next-hop. Makes sense since the inbound client route-map is the intermediately stage of getting the route into the PE's routing table and the next-hop sel...
Peter, Thanks for your reply. Please see CSCui82452 for more details. The only workaround that currently exits is to use 2 different loopbacks to establish two different BGP sessions BGP sessions to each of the RR -- one that does labeled-unicast o...
Hi John,Thanks for your response. AS75 was a hypothetical AS. In all honestly, I'm not at all sure of the ASes that I'll receive from any given peer.KR,Andrew
The problem and the solution have been identified. MPLS-TE is fully compatible with /31 addressing. For reasons that are beyond the scope of the current post (subject of a case), Cisco IOS / IOS XR maintain in the MPLS-TE dB (SPF) the old IP address...
Hi Martin,Thanks for your answer.I didn't mention NAT in my initial post, however I can confirm that we are using static NAT on the remote Firewall where the codecs are for one-for-one mappings (i.e. an RFC1918 address is statically natted to 1 uniqu...
