Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About TrivialPants
09-18-2019
Stats
Member since
04-18-2018
6
Posts
0
Helpful
0
Solutions
08-14-2019
09:57 PM
I just wanted to note that I stated that this was an issue between to different AS's, but it is one AS. I apologize. There is one AS with two networks on the AS. The issue is on network 2 out of the two networks. We are connected on both using a 10gig interface, and have even tried the same test interfaces for testing to isolate the issue. The BGP does not appear to have any issues on the Internet router which is hosting the BGP sessions, and the handoffs look good to the core router. For simplicity, I just showed that we are using a 10 gig interface for each, because even in testing it doesn't matter on the same 10Gigabit interfaces (or any interfaces, on other handoffs, the network 2 still has the higher load times).
... View more
08-13-2019
08:00 PM
I’ve got two BGP AS’s that are used on my network. They are both located on the same Internet router. AS1 has no issues, but AS2 has displayed some issues where some webpages load for longer than others. They have a much longer TTFB time (~15 seconds) compared to AS1 for the same site. All the routes look good in BGP and physical handoff interfaces appear good too. It doesn’t seem to be related to the physical interfaces but to the AS2 itself as a whole. Any IP in that block is having that issue. Has anyone seen anything like this? It appears like an issue with content providers, but the affected sites don’t appear to share hosts.
... View more
Labels:
08-13-2019
07:41 PM
Sorry to reply a bit late to this. I got a count of the EFPs in the bridge-domain. It does equal 64 currently. That is the issue! Thanks so much! I have moved a new /26 over on a separate bridge-domain. I can add a new service instance with the new bridge-domain, and I am keeping the 64 EFP limit in mind.
... View more
08-12-2019
10:15 AM
Some info. I am using a 903 Router as a handoff for /30 on an Internet core router upstream which I xconnect from the 903 to various other edge routers through transport MPLS circuits. On the 903 I am using a ten gigabit port with service instances that are tagged accordingly and have the other ends of the xconnects labeled on them. The xconnects showed up when they were not working, but I would not get two-way traffic. I was able to move to a different port on the Internet core router and 903 and use the same port on the transport router on the other end of the xconnect with the same VC id, but the xconnect came up (well it was up before, but now it has two way traffic, and I can reach both ends from one another). I also used the same IP addresses. On the tengigabit handoff interface, I have about 20 handoffs, is there any xconnect or service instance limit I am reaching? I don't have trouble programming these (no errors, etc.) but is there anything I am encroaching upon or any bugs I would be seeing? 903 Code: IOS: 16.09.02 ROMMON: 15.6(33r)S
... View more
Labels:
08-07-2019
10:46 AM
We have setup where we are using a bridge-domain interface to connect to different CPEs through our ME3800. The BDI is setup on say BDI3 and we receive on different ports with different encapsulations/vlans, then strip the incoming tags off and place them into the bridge-domain 3. This allows the traffic to see the BDI3 as the default gateway. The 3800X is running a DHCP server as well on that same subnet. We have noticed a problem that is keeping us from adding more bridge-domain 3 statements to the router. We can add different bridge-domains, but are unable to add this one. Is there a limit to how many global bridge-domain counts we can have on all the interfaces? The incoming encapsulation is different and they are separated by different ports and on the ports where we have the same bridge-domain applied, they have different encapsulation and service instances. Here is the error message I am getting: GigabitEthernet0/10 service instance 6: Unable to add to bridge-domain 3 If I remove the bridge-domain from another port (that I am not currently using, I suppose it doesn't matter what port I do it on) then I am able to add the bridge-domain to the port.
... View more
Labels:
10-15-2018
10:29 AM
Yes, but I believe it is only used to store information on statically assigned DHCP bindings. So it is really useful if you wish to manually assign IPs and keep a backup of the exact bindings (IP to MAC-Address), but it wouldn't be useful for automatically assigned IPs.
A form of syslog would be useful for record-keeping if it only retained the info that the DHCP database does.
... View more
08-14-2019
I just wanted to note that I stated that this was an issue between to
different AS's, but it is one ...
08-13-2019
I’ve got two BGP AS’s that are used on my network. They are both located
on the same Internet router...
08-13-2019
Sorry to reply a bit late to this. I got a count of the EFPs in the
bridge-domain. It does equal 64 ...
08-12-2019
Some info. I am using a 903 Router as a handoff for /30 on an Internet
core router upstream which I ...
08-07-2019
We have setup where we are using a bridge-domain interface to connect to
different CPEs through our ...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 04-18-2018 12:55 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 09-18-2019 01:01 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 6 |
