Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,I am working with a client who would like to use multiple 7018 chassis as Server Access vs. 5k and 2k'sPutting the commercial angle to the side are there any reasons technically why this is a bad ideaMy view is that it should work fine, assuing th...
Hi allI have a customer who has a 4.1(3) CUCM Cluster and needs to interface with a Mitel 3300 across a private P2P WAN for the purpose of initiating and transferring calls (in both directions). Both endpoints support SIP and the functions required s...
Hi,I am working on a network design that could possibly use alot of Policy based routing and wanted to check a couple of points. the network will soley be made up of 6500's and with SUP720-VS's.1)Can multiple policy maps be applied to different inter...
the pipe between the site is a point to point private 100 Mbps Ethernet circuits addressed with a /30However due to overlapping IP Addresses at both locations NAT will need to be implemented.
Hi,Thanks for the comments.the feedback from my Cisco SE is that it "should" work, however the usual testing caveats apply.the SIP trunk is not for PSTN calls and we intend to have a prefix that will be used to initiate the SIP trunk.Would the SBC ne...
below is a link through to the QA on the 522 NMOn paper it can do8-Mbps optimized WAN throughput800 Concurrent TCP connectionshttp://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6870/products_qanda_item0900aecd806bfdf8.shtml
one last point, when you say that the failover would be immediate, there must be a 1 or 2 sec lag whilst tcp sessions are rest and commence again?are there any documented expected recovery times by cisco? I know its a pedantic question as the whole i...
