01-29-2013 05:31 AM
Hello, I have two WAP4410n and I want to use it in roaming mode. All two points configured to use same SSID, psk-key, but used different channels (5 and 9). The problem is that sometime second point is not accessible until I restart it. I connect to the wlan using first point than move to the room with second and there is no roamig. Is this a point problem or bad settings?
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-29-2013 11:13 AM
Hi llya, seamless "roaming" is not really achievable without a wireless LAN controller. Your only option with the WAP4410n is as a repeating function and this device has a known history of dropping connectivity.
-Tom
Please mark answered for helpful posts
01-29-2013 11:47 AM
llya, seamless roaming is not really achievable unless you have a wireless lan controller. You will always have a service interruption or connection impact. Additionally, repeating causes automatic 50% penalty of throughput per repeat. This is not a Cisco limitation, this is a global, vendor-neutral limitation.
I am sure there is a beta firmware, you would have to call the support center to request escalation for beta software.
-Tom
Please mark answered for helpful posts
01-29-2013 06:19 AM
Hi llya, I assume you mean to say using as a repeater.
The AP has a couple known issues
CSCts76476—The access point may periodically experience loss of
connectivity when configured in bridge mode. Workaround: Unplug the
power adaptor or PoE cable, and then plug it back in.
• CSCtx62203—In certain environments and traffic model, the WAP4410N
may lockup after some undetermined time. Workaround: Reboot the
device.
-Tom
Please mark answered for helpful posts
01-29-2013 11:07 AM
Hi Tom, saying "roaming" I mean this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_LAN#Roaming
I already deploy roaming wireless networks based on cheap wireless access points and it works good but have problems with lots of wireless clients. So the idea was to change cheap AP to WAP4410n and I have no success.
In bridge mode we repeating signal from base point but the wireless link between this two points is too low. It works worse than roaming model.
01-29-2013 11:13 AM
Hi llya, seamless "roaming" is not really achievable without a wireless LAN controller. Your only option with the WAP4410n is as a repeating function and this device has a known history of dropping connectivity.
-Tom
Please mark answered for helpful posts
01-29-2013 11:34 AM
Tom, can you explain why I can't configure seamless "roaming" without "wireless LAN controller"? Is there any way to use any software instead of real hardware controller? Thank you.
01-29-2013 11:40 AM
I found this conversation and it's clear
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2018524
One more question. WAP410n already bought is there a way to upgrade firmware (may be non official) to enable seamless roaming? I think that is a software restriction. May be it's not a good idea to ask this here =)
01-29-2013 11:47 AM
llya, seamless roaming is not really achievable unless you have a wireless lan controller. You will always have a service interruption or connection impact. Additionally, repeating causes automatic 50% penalty of throughput per repeat. This is not a Cisco limitation, this is a global, vendor-neutral limitation.
I am sure there is a beta firmware, you would have to call the support center to request escalation for beta software.
-Tom
Please mark answered for helpful posts
01-29-2013 11:53 AM
In russian there is a bad translation of "helpful post". It's called "right answer".That's why I didn't click it =) I don't know right it or not =)
Thank you Tom I'll follow you advice.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide