04-07-2017 05:44 PM - edited 07-05-2021 06:49 AM
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-08-2017 03:23 AM
Hello!
If I understand the question, you have one WLC and two cores ( primary and secondary).
If you can use LAG between primary and secondary ( stack, VPC, VSS) - use LAG to connect WLC to primary and secondary.
If not, basic scenario - connect WLC to one core: primary or seconsary (no matter how many links).
But if you want, you can configure on WLC two AP-Manager interfaces and assign one AP-manager to one phisical port WLC and second AP-manager to second phisical port WLC. Connect one Phisical port to one core, second phisical port no second core.
See below (Configuring Multiple AP-Manager Interfaces on Wireless LAN Controller (WLC)
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/118311/configuring-multiple-ap-manager-interfaces-wireless-lan-controller-wlc
04-07-2017 07:19 PM
Put the controller in the core.
04-08-2017 03:23 AM
Hello!
If I understand the question, you have one WLC and two cores ( primary and secondary).
If you can use LAG between primary and secondary ( stack, VPC, VSS) - use LAG to connect WLC to primary and secondary.
If not, basic scenario - connect WLC to one core: primary or seconsary (no matter how many links).
But if you want, you can configure on WLC two AP-Manager interfaces and assign one AP-manager to one phisical port WLC and second AP-manager to second phisical port WLC. Connect one Phisical port to one core, second phisical port no second core.
See below (Configuring Multiple AP-Manager Interfaces on Wireless LAN Controller (WLC)
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/118311/configuring-multiple-ap-manager-interfaces-wireless-lan-controller-wlc
04-08-2017 07:40 PM
Thank you ableousov. I appreciate your answer.
I did lag on both core.
I'm planning to create 3 ssids & interfaces. Can you advice me how to route traffic from & to.
1) Ssid A- corporate users route traffic through core.
2) Ssid B - limited Guest users route traffic through core.
3) said C- BYOD users route to direct internet. Not through core switch.
How can I do through controller to pass it?
04-09-2017 01:58 AM
Great!
WLC do not route traffic (this is not usual router). It takes packet from wireless client and put in to VLAN with this manner: SSID1 -> VLAN1, SSID2->VLAN2. The core switches need to provide first-hop unicast and multicast routing for each wireless VLAN (if they route traffic). See blow:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/8-1/Enterprise-Mobility-8-1-Design-Guide/Enterprise_Mobility_8-1_Deployment_Guide/cuwn.html#65102
I think in your case , core need to route ssidA(vlanA) and ssidB (vlanB) traffic directly and pass through itself ssidC(vlanC) traffic to internet gateway (router) without routing by 802.1q trunk.
04-12-2017 01:29 PM
So with this manner, Do i have to create same VLANs on core switch & do i have to give respective ip to this vlans? and where i can configure Gatway ip? so i can place on controller to send it there?
thank you,
04-13-2017 12:47 AM
I suppose, you can physically connect WLC to core, but logically - to FW. Gateway will be on FW. Core will pass through VLANs from WLC, these VLAN will go to "outside" interface (you need to create same VLANs on core, but shold not create IP interface for this VLAN on core). VLANs from FW you can route on core, because they will be "inside".
04-09-2017 02:07 AM
All traffic goes through WLC by default (central switching).
CAPWAP provides the configuration and management of APs and WLANs in addition to encapsulation and forwarding of WLAN client traffic between an AP and a WLAN controller (WLC).
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/8-1/Enterprise-Mobility-8-1-Design-Guide/Enterprise_Mobility_8-1_Deployment_Guide/cuwn.html#45944
04-10-2017 10:41 AM
Thanks Abelousov!
Can you share information to how can i apply lag setting from 2port 10g fiber wlc5520 to both N9k cores?
thanks,
04-10-2017 11:47 AM
On WLC you just need to configure "config lag enable " and reboot it. On N9K you need to configure VPC and static etherchannel. Try to google configuration guide on cisco.com. All guides are in public access.
04-11-2017 06:49 AM
Thank you Alexey,
Here is another thing,We change topology and see attachment below.
Can we still perform LAG? if it is, then how can i configure with one wlc interface to core & another interface with checkpoint FW?
According to topology design, Internet traffic are handover through AP>wlc>fw>internet & corp traffic are AP>wlc>core>
If you share with me how to configure each ssid & it's vlan interface with wlc to fw respectively?
thanks,
04-11-2017 07:30 AM
Hello!
Can we still perform LAG
Yes, if you configure VPC on core.
if it is, then how can i configure with one wlc interface to core & another interface with checkpoint FW?
You need to do this on core. VLAN 11,15-16 go tgrough core to FW (L3 Gateway). for VLAN 12,20 L3 Gateway - Core.
If you share with me how to configure each ssid & it's vlan interface with wlc to fw respectively?
Look here:
https://mrncciew.com/2013/02/27/configuring-dynamic-interfaces-on-wlc/
In your case, I think, I would put all interfaces WLC behind FW (FW will be L3 gateway for all WLC interfaces). And FW then would control all traffic flows.
04-12-2017 06:52 AM
I agree with you Alexey, But Can we place
1) One WLC interface to Core 1 switch
2) second WLC interface directly to checkpoint FW?
thanks,
04-12-2017 07:36 AM
I would connect both WLC physical interfaces to core (for LAG) and forward all VLANs from WLC through core on L2 OSI Layer (without L3 interfaces on core).
04-08-2017 03:29 AM
You can place WLC to DMZ or Core. WLC is not route traffic , WLC is connected by 802.1q trunk to dmz or core switch. Core or DMZ have to route traffic. If you will use central switching - all traffic will go to WLC, if you will use local switching, all wireless client traffic will go out from AP directry.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide