CVE-2023-20198 Software Web UI Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

[Thomas Obbekaer Thomsen]

This seems bad. - "I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean, "bad"? "........

LWA, and basically also CWA, uses the webservice of the 9800.

Should we all just shut down our guest networks until a workaround / patch can be found ?

Currently that is what Im thinking.

Can anyone shed some light on my concern ?

[marce1000]

                             >...Can anyone shed some light on my concern ?
  - The advised strategy  for security issues with Cisco products , is : use the recommended software version first , for the 9800 platforms that would be 17.9.4 , if the particular security problem is detected again and depending on business need -> contact TAC , 

 M.

[Thomas Obbekaer Thomsen]

So what you are saying is "this is fine" ? (insert "this is fine meme" here).

[marce1000]

              - As far as can recall my mind I am 'just saying' : the opposite , 

 M.

[marce1000]

 - FYI : https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-iosxe-webui-privesc-j22SaA4z
                                           https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwh87343

 M.
                                 

[Yasuhiro Ikuta]

Looking at BugsearchTool, known affected releases include 17.6.5 and 17.3.3, but does it also affect 17.12.1?
I don't know how to try this vulnerability CVE-2023-20198.

[Thomas Obbekaer Thomsen]

the CVE basically says all IOS-XE products with the webservice enabled.

And there are no "fixes", so there is a very big possibility that all IOS-XE softwares are affected.

The only recommendation is also just to turn of http and https until a patch can be made available. 

[marce1000]

   Ref :   https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-iosxe-webui-privesc-j22SaA4z
  >...If the ip http server command is present and the configuration also contains ip http active-session-modules none, the vulnerability is not exploitable over HTTP.
     If the ip http secure-server command is present and the configuration also contains ip http secure-active-session-modules none, the vulnerability is not exploitable over HTTPS.

 M.

[Thomas Obbekaer Thomsen]

Yes that makes perfect sense, that telling the config that you cannot have any sessions to the webservice makes the exploit not work.

I dont know what scenario you would configure this in. Enable the webservice, but not have it accept any sessions ?

But Im pretty certain (and I have not tested this) that this will also make CWA and LWA not work.

[marce1000]

   - The workaround does not relate to  sessions  , it prevents the web server from loading additional modules ,

 M.

[r.heitmann]

(this information is useless for WLC users, I apologize)

• but disabling the "session-modules" breaks the IOS-CA
  • no CRLs can be downloaded afterward
  • a "HTTP 502" is returned instead

[RoadRunner4k]

Would be nice to know if the recommended releases are fixed from this CVE Lets us know Thomas if you hear something.

[Thomas Obbekaer Thomsen]

Havent heard anything additional yet.

But this being a 10.0 ... I mean .. thats  bad ... 

And the silence from Cisco worries me.

So Im right now recommending my customers to not use LWA or CWA as a precaution.

[Rich R]

Definitely no fixed versions - all are affected.

[Finn Rud Laursen]

Not a particularly concrete answer to Thomas.
It would be nice to know if enabled central web auth on the WLC contributes to security vulnerabilities or not.

/Finn