11-29-2010 04:33 PM - edited 07-03-2021 07:28 PM
12-05-2010 05:48 PM
Hi EAP-FAST doesnt need any certs.. we need to generate PAC.. here is the link.. which gives the comparison between various EAPs
here is the link to generate or Use the PAC
lemme know if this helps..
Regards
Surendra
12-04-2010 09:25 PM
Why not go for LOCAL EAP with MAC filtering?? here is the configuration example..
LOCAL LEAP
===========
and
MAC FILTERING
============
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-13767
lemme know if this answered your question..
Regards
Surendra
======
Please dont forget to rate the post if this answered your question
12-05-2010 02:02 AM
Hi and thank you for your reply.
I already have tried LEAP with MAC on Local RADIUS and works fine! But I'm sure that EAP-FAST provides a more secure way (PACs) to protect the communication between the radio interface and clients in terms of possible dictionary or man-in-the middle attacks.
Regarding the ACL , how can I specificaly implement for my radio 802.11g interface an ACL which exclude ALL TIME all IPs except those 2 static IPs assigned to my handheld clients and further more, permits the association, authentication and traffic of those 2 IPs with the AP on a daily basis but from 14:00 till 07:00 assuming though that the AP will be administratively reachable via WEB Console or Telnet any day/time?
Regards
VP
12-05-2010 02:58 AM
Hi,
In the local server settings you can select EAP-FAST as well instead of LEAP..
Now the access list part of it..
here is the configuration..
en
conf t
time-range hi
period weekdays
end
config t
ip access-list extended 111
access-list 111 permit ip host
access-list 111 permit ip host
eg-
access-list 111 permit ip host 10.10.10.10 any time-range hi
access-list 111 permit ip host 10.10.10.11 any time-range hi
end
conf t
int dot11 0
ip access-group 111 in
lemme know if this answered your question..
Regards
Surendra
========
Please dont forget to rate the post if this was helpful for you or usefull
12-05-2010 12:25 PM
Hi again,
Regarding the ACL everything is OK but I still have problems with EAP-FAST setup. Does EAP-FAST demand a private certificate?
On our site there're 2 MC5574 handheld clients. When I try to setup a WLAN profile on both of them and select EAP-FAST the system ask me to select one of the 3 protocols MS-CHAP, EAP-TLS, EAP-GTC for tunneling Authentication. In either case then asks for a User Certificate to install.
This is weird because I thought that EAP-FAST establishes a tunneling authentication via PACs and that's it!. In case a PAC stands for a private certificate and the AP has the default settings for EAP-FAST meaning that it will create and provide the PAC upon client request, what is the point for a private certificate authority involvement?
Regards
VP
12-05-2010 05:48 PM
Hi EAP-FAST doesnt need any certs.. we need to generate PAC.. here is the link.. which gives the comparison between various EAPs
here is the link to generate or Use the PAC
lemme know if this helps..
Regards
Surendra
12-06-2010 12:55 PM
Hi,
these were very helpful links
Thank you very much for your support
Regards
Vasilis
12-04-2010 09:26 PM
In the LOCAL LEAP config example, you can select EAP-FAST as well if you dont want the LEAP to be configured..
Regards
Surendra
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide