12-10-2024 02:32 PM
Hi Folks,
I'm looking for the most suitable Cisco antenna from Table 5, page 11 of the attached installation document that is compatible with the IW9167EH access point operating in the URWB mode.
As I understand the IW9167EH documentation, the URWB is the best mode to act as a wireless bridge between two buildings.
- My buildings are about 1,000 feet apart and a directional antenna would be best suited to ensure max gain between the two buildings.
Which antennas on this list would work best to ensure high-speed data traffic between two, IW9167EH-B-URWB bridges (one on each building) and why would you recommend it over the other directional antennas on the list below? Is there a better wireless solution to connect two building LANs?
IW-ANT-PNL-59-N= 5 GHz Dual-Port Dual-Slant +/-45 Degree Polarized Directional Panel Antenna
IW-ANT-SKS-514-Q= 5 GHz Directional Shark Antenna, Dual-Slant +/-45 Degree Polarized
IW-ANT-SKD-513-Q= 5 GHz Bidirectional Shark Antenna, Dual-Slant +/-45 Degree Polarized
IW-ANT-H90-510-N= 5 GHz Dual-Port Dual-Polarized Horn Antenna
FLMESH-HW-ANT-28 5 GHz Dual-Port Dual-Slant Polarized Directional Panel Antenna
IW-ANT-PNL-59-N= Cisco Spot-S 2x2 Wi-Fi MIMO Antenna
Much appreciated! John
12-10-2024 02:54 PM
I also found this antenna, Cisco Dual-Linear Polarized Sector Antenna (IW-ANT-SS9-516-N on Cisco's Antenna selection guide:
12-13-2024 11:39 AM
Thank you....upon further research, the shark antennas seem more appropriate for train car environments....not building to building which are at different levels. Also, I've determined that IP67 rating is required -- waterproof.
12-12-2024 07:11 PM
For connecting two buildings 1,000 feet apart with the IW9167EH-B-URWB AP in wireless bridge mode, the best antenna options are:
Both antennas provide high gain for reliable, high-speed data transfer. The IW-ANT-SS9-516-N is an alternative, but it may not offer the same focused gain for a point-to-point setup.
12-13-2024 11:40 AM
Thank you....upon further research, the shark antennas seem more appropriate for train car environments....not building to building which are at different levels. Also, I've determined that IP67 rating is required -- waterproof.
12-12-2024 07:39 PM
How far are the two buildings?
What kind of organization is this business, government, commercial, etc?
12-13-2024 11:41 AM
1,000 feet has mentioned in the problem write up and the buildings are at different heights. Type of customer's business isn't relevant to this technical discussion.
12-13-2024 03:54 PM - edited 12-13-2024 03:55 PM
@EW1025 wrote:
Type of customer's business isn't relevant to this technical discussion.
For security-related or security conscious business, wireless transmission may not allowed.
@EW1025 wrote:
1,000 feet has mentioned in the problem write up and the buildings are at different heights.
Fibre optic may be expensive but it can scale and can achieve at higher bandwidth than WiFi 7 bridge. I can put multiple circulators with one strand and the bandwidth realize is endless.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide