Help me pick a Cisco wireless lan controller...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2022 12:53 AM
I'm stuck between two - the 2504 and the 5508. I know the 5508 will be a larger power hog being full 1u form factor, but I've read it's got a faster backplane and will do 8g simultaneously (vs 1g on the 2504).
The 5508 is also more readily available on the used market, with examples available for around the $75 mark. The 2504 is considerably more expensive, hovering around $175, unless you wait for an outlier to pop up.
Any reason I'm missing to *not* go with a 5508 over the 2504?
I've got a 3750g poe switch, so port the extra ports on the 5508 are of little use (unless I don't need injectors for my AP's, which I do currently).
- Labels:
-
Other Wireless Topics
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2022 01:19 AM
Hi
I am assuming this is for a LAB.
If you can get 5508, why not but in terms of lab, both will do the same.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2022 01:33 AM
Here are the best describe the things.
discussion links are also attached.
Not supported on 2504.
•Support for wired guest access.
•Cisco 2500 Series Controller cannot be configured as an auto anchor controller. However you can configure it as a foreign controller.
•Supports only multicast-multicast mode.
•Bandwidth Contract feature is unsupported.
•Access points plugged directly into the WLC.
•Service port support
•Apple Talk Bridging
•LAG
•Wired Guest
------------------------------------------------------------
The 2504 has 300mbps throughput and you cannot use all 4 ports or LAG.
The 5508 gives you 8 gig with LAG.
You want 400 laptops, lets optimistally say we only need 10mbps to each laptop so we have 400x10 which is 4Gbps throughput.
Theoretically you could push a lot more through.
22x450mbps from the access points is nearly 10Gbps.
OK yes there is oversubscription but at least give them a chance at a decent user experience.
You could deploy with the 2504 using H-REAP to get around it but its a school.
What is their wireless vision, streamiing and multicasting video, yeah probably in the future.
If you put a 2504 in now they will eplace it with a 5508 eventually.
https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/2504-vs-5508/td-p/1656627
https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-5508-vs-2504/td-p/1748319
Thanks,
Jitendra
Jitendra
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2022 05:20 AM
I go with 5508 for Long run ( i am sure this will end of Life soon or later)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2022 09:32 AM
Well both products are completely end of support within the next year so keep that in mind:
So it really depends what your requirements are as per the answers others have already given.
Please click Helpful if this post helped you and Select as Solution (drop down menu at top right of this reply) if this answered your query.
------------------------------
TAC recommended codes for AireOS WLC's and TAC recommended codes for 9800 WLC's
Best Practices for AireOS WLC's, Best Practices for 9800 WLC's and Cisco Wireless compatibility matrix
Check your 9800 WLC config with Wireless Config Analyzer using "show tech wireless" output or "config paging disable" then "show run-config" output on AireOS and use Wireless Debug Analyzer to analyze your WLC client debugs
Field Notice: FN63942 APs and WLCs Fail to Create CAPWAP Connections Due to Certificate Expiration
Field Notice: FN72424 Later Versions of WiFi 6 APs Fail to Join WLC - Software Upgrade Required
Field Notice: FN72524 IOS APs stuck in downloading state after 4 Dec 2022 due to Certificate Expired
- Fixed in 8.10.196.0, latest 9800 releases, 8.5.182.12 (8.5.182.13 for 3504) and 8.5.182.109 (IRCM, 8.5.182.111 for 3504)
Field Notice: FN70479 AP Fails to Join or Joins with 1 Radio due to Country Mismatch, RMA needed
How to avoid boot loop due to corrupted image on Wave 2 and Catalyst 11ax Access Points (CSCvx32806)
Field Notice: FN74035 - Wave2 APs DFS May Not Detect Radar After Channel Availability Check Time
Leo's list of bugs affecting 2800/3800/4800/1560 APs
Default AP console baud rate from 17.12.x is 115200 - introduced by CSCwe88390
