- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-03-2023 06:16 PM
Is there a nice summary out there that describes the functional issues of attempting to use legacy 3800 and 2800 APs with new 9120 APs? From what I have heard, WiFi-6 APs do not play nicely with the older models. I need to summarize the issues. Thanks in advance.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-03-2023 06:28 PM
Don't mix x800-series APs with Catalyst APs.
x800-series have a MARVAL radio chipset and Cisco has been trying hard to "tame" the bugs associate with them. I believe they have already "given up" trying to fix these bugs on AireOS.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-03-2023 06:28 PM
Don't mix x800-series APs with Catalyst APs.
x800-series have a MARVAL radio chipset and Cisco has been trying hard to "tame" the bugs associate with them. I believe they have already "given up" trying to fix these bugs on AireOS.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-03-2023 06:57 PM
*** Please rate helpful posts ***
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-17-2024 08:16 PM
As recommended above the Roaming between X700, X800 and 9120 access points would lead to disconnection at client end. Is there any solution to opt this scenario?
In case each floor has same model as 1st floor X700, 2nd Floor 9120, 3rd floor X800, and they all are connected to 9800 WLC. So hope there won't be any issues arises for end client.
