01-28-2014 08:18 AM
Hello All
We are performing pppoe termination in asr9k / IOSXR 4.3.1 Usually we begin with a single range per ipv4 pool and based on user
demand we insert additional pools e.g.
pool vrf default ipv4 test
address-range 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.255
address-range 192.168.2.0 192.168.2.255
In some cases we may need to take a step backwards, delete a particular range from an existing pool. We are looking for a way to logout the corresponding subscribers.
For example if we need to move the range 192.168.2.0 192.168.2.255 to another asr9k we must:
- Delete the range 192.168.2.0 192.168.2.255 from the pool test
- Stop sending advertising corresponding route
- Logout subscribers with 192.168.2.x only (we are looking for a way to implement this step)
When the range is deleted the corresponding subscriber sessions are unaffected in 4.3.1. Is there any IOS command in 4.3.1 (or tools in IOS_XR) that we may have overlooked?
(we may start looking into CoA to develop something)
Thanks for your help
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-02-2014 05:36 AM
hi victor, i think in this case using COA or more specifically the packet of disconnect type fnctionality to disconnect subscribers that match a certain ip address.
Here are a few examples as to how to work with that:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-16677
you can also clear subscribers by access interface for instnce, but if they have a mix of adds from different pools this is not helping that much.
So COA an disconnecting them individually is the best play.
Probably easiest to send coa disconnects for x.x.x.1 x.x.x.x.2 etc sequentially.
cheers!
xander
02-02-2014 05:36 AM
hi victor, i think in this case using COA or more specifically the packet of disconnect type fnctionality to disconnect subscribers that match a certain ip address.
Here are a few examples as to how to work with that:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-16677
you can also clear subscribers by access interface for instnce, but if they have a mix of adds from different pools this is not helping that much.
So COA an disconnecting them individually is the best play.
Probably easiest to send coa disconnects for x.x.x.1 x.x.x.x.2 etc sequentially.
cheers!
xander
02-03-2014 01:35 PM
Hello and thanks for the link, will check the CoA / packet of disconnect
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide