Dear all,
I have a case as below.
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS16.01#show running-config policy-map QUEUING_TO_PE
Mon Jan 14 00:46:59.623 HANOI
policy-map QUEUING_TO_PE
class PQ1
priority level 1
police rate percent 100
!
!
class PQ2
priority level 2
police rate percent 100
!
!
class WFQ4
bandwidth percent 33
!
class WFQ3
bandwidth percent 26
!
class WFQ2
bandwidth percent 20
!
class WFQ1
bandwidth percent 13
!
class class-default
bandwidth percent 8
random-detect discard-class 0 60 ms 100 ms
!
end-policy-map
!
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS16.01#configure terminal
Mon Jan 14 00:42:29.384 HANOI
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS16.01(config)#interface bundle-ether 25
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS16.01(config-if)#no service-policy output
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS16.01(config-if)#service-policy output QUEUING_TO_PE
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS16.01(config-if)#commit
Mon Jan 14 00:43:36.641 HANOI
% Failed to commit one or more configuration items during a pseudo-atomic operation. All changes made have been reverted. Please issue 'show configuration failed [inheritance]' from this session to view the errors
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:NTH9205CRT01.CKV.CRS16.01(config-if)#show configuration failed [inheritance]
Mon Jan 14 00:43:47.840 HANOI
!! SEMANTIC ERRORS: This configuration was rejected by
!! the system due to semantic errors. The individual
!! errors with each failed configuration command can be
!! found below.
interface Bundle-Ether25
service-policy output QUEUING_TO_PE
!!% 'qos_ea' detected the 'fatal' condition 'qos policy is not supported'
!
end
But when I've configured under another bundle interface (BE31), it has been permitted.
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS16.01#configure terminal
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS16.01(config)#interface Bundle-Ether31
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS16.01(config-if)#no service-policy output
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS16.01(config-if)#service-policy output QUEUING_TO_PE
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS16.01(config-if)#commit
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS16.01(config-if)#
I figure out the interface member of BE35 belong to FP-140, instead of 40x10Ge as BE31.
Bundle-Ether31 is up, line protocol is up
Interface state transitions: 1
Hardware is Aggregated Ethernet interface(s), address is b0aa.77ba.8018
No. of members in this bundle: 2
TenGigE0/0/0/31 Full-duplex 10000Mb/s Active
TenGigE0/0/0/38 Full-duplex 10000Mb/s Active
Bundle-Ether25 is up, line protocol is up
Interface state transitions: 1
No. of members in this bundle: 4
TenGigE0/6/0/0 Full-duplex 10000Mb/s Active
TenGigE0/6/0/1 Full-duplex 10000Mb/s Active
TenGigE0/6/0/2 Full-duplex 10000Mb/s Active
TenGigE0/6/0/3 Full-duplex 10000Mb/s Active
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CRS16.01#admin show platform
Mon Jan 14 08:15:45.139 HANOI
Node Type PLIM State Config State
------------- ----------------- ------------------ --------------- ---------------
0/0/CPU0 LSP-X 40-10GbE IOS XR RUN PWR,NSHUT,MON
0/5/CPU0 LSP-X 4-100GbE IOS XR RUN PWR,NSHUT,MON
0/6/CPU0 FP-140G 14-10GbE IOS XR RUN PWR,NSHUT,MON
0/8/CPU0 FP-140G 14-10GbE IOS XR RUN PWR,NSHUT,MON
0/9/CPU0 LSP-X 4-100GbE IOS XR RUN PWR,NSHUT,MON
0/10/CPU0 LSP-X 4-100GbE IOS XR RUN PWR,NSHUT,MON
0/RP0/CPU0 RP(Active) N/A IOS XR RUN PWR,NSHUT,MON
0/RP1/CPU0 RP(Standby) N/A IOS XR RUN PWR,NSHUT,MON
Does the FP-140G affect to the QoS configuration? Please let me know it any documentation or advice for me.
Thank in advance.
