06-14-2024 12:55 PM - edited 06-14-2024 02:22 PM
Does anyone have experience with NC57-MPA-2D4H-S and telling them they should be 400G? Installed on NCS-57C3-MOD-SYS
I am following this guide a Cisco Doc: Interface and Hardware Component Configuration Guide for Cisco NCS 5500 Series Routers, IOS XR Release 7.3.x | Information About Preconfiguring Physical Interfaces
Location Card type HWver FPD device ATR Status Running Programd
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0/0/2 NC57-MPA-2D4H-S 1.0 MPAFPGA CURRENT 0.07 0.07
0/0/3 NC57-MPA-2D4H-S 1.0 MPAFPGA CURRENT 0.07 0.07
Cisco IOS XR Software, Version 7.9.2
cisco NCS-5500 () processor
Command in place:
Building configuration...
!! IOS XR Configuration 7.9.2
hw-module port-range 0 1 instance 0 location 0/0/3 mode 400
end
(config)#commit
% Failed to commit one or more configuration items during a pseudo-atomic operation. All changes made have been reverted. Please issue 'show configuration failed [inheritance]'
(config)#show configuration failed
!! SEMANTIC ERRORS: This configuration was rejected by
!! the system due to semantic errors. The individual
!! errors with each failed configuration command can be
!! found below.
hw-module port-range 0 1 instance 0 location 0/0/3 mode 400
!!% 'CfgMgr' detected the 'fatal' condition 'This configuration has not been verified and can not be accepted by the system.'
end
I have tried a variety of shut, no shut on the port Hu0/0/3/0
Hu0/0/3/0 admin-down admin-down
Hu0/0/3/1 admin-down admin-down
Hu0/0/3/2 admin-down admin-down
Hu0/0/3/3 admin-down admin-down
The goal is to configure this MPA for 400G-only mode.
I'd settle for 200G.
We do have optics in place: Optics Type: QDD 400G BRT ZRP
Edit: In case this is useful to anyone.
show install active summary
Label : 7.9.2
Active Packages: 7
ncs5500-xr-7.9.2 version=7.9.2 [Boot image]
ncs5500-healthcheck-1.0.0.0-r792
ncs5500-isis-1.0.0.0-r792
ncs5500-mgbl-1.0.0.0-r792
ncs5500-mpls-1.0.0.0-r792
ncs5500-mpls-te-rsvp-1.0.0.0-r792
ncs5500-ospf-1.0.0.0-r792
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-15-2024 05:47 PM
06-14-2024 01:24 PM
Can you try the below config?
Thanks
hw-module port-range 0 1 instance 3 location 0/0/3 mode 400
06-14-2024 01:34 PM
Same result. No-go.
!! SEMANTIC ERRORS: This configuration was rejected by
!! the system due to semantic errors. The individual
!! errors with each failed configuration command can be
!! found below.
hw-module port-range 0 1 instance 3 location 0/0/3 mode 400
!!% 'CfgMgr' detected the 'fatal' condition 'This configuration has not been verified and can not be accepted by the system.'
end
Question. When I ? after instance:
(config)#hw-module port-range 0 3 instance ?
<0-5> MPA Instance 1,2,3 etc for MPA's
What does that mean? Can I try different variables (such as: hw-module port-range 0 1 instance 1 location 0/0/3 mode 400) without breaking things?
06-15-2024 05:47 PM
06-15-2024 06:56 PM
Thank you for the doc. That worked for me. Command I used:
hw-module port-range 0 1 instance 2 location 0/0/CPU0 mode 400
Result:
FH0/0/2/0 up up
Hu0/0/2/2 admin-down admin-down
Hu0/0/2/3 admin-down admin-down
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide