Cisco Bug Discussions

I have this issue on teh bug search it says its fixed by later versions of the CUCM however this is a problem with the OVA the latest OVA I can see for 10.5 is 1.9 version and thsi was 2015 is there a newer version to fix this where do I get an OVA t...

I made the changes suggested by Bug ID CSCuy49354 and did a full reboot of my CSM.  I checked the backup.pl script and my changes were still there after the reboot.  The problem went away for maybe a couple of weeks but has returned.  I don't get the...

Anyone tried to download the cop file- ciscocm.DRS_drfCleanHistory.cop.sgn

"The spanning-tree pseudo-information command is not available on Cisco Nexus 92160 and Cisco Nexus 93180 switches starting from Release 7.0(3)I4(1)." https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus9000/sw/7-x/interfaces/configuration...

is there any work around for that bug  antivirus unscannable '0x' body.scan CSCup86350 thanks

I've created a Cisco Packet Tracer assignment using the Activity Wizard. The students create 3 static routes on a router and the Assessment marks them correct. If the assignment is saved and opened, the 3 static routes are marked incorrectly and a lo...

I'm having this issue with several agents using IE on Finesse version 11.6.   The workaround is to: Clear certificates and manually re-install them, or possibly push out via AD.   Is this referring to removing the cert on the local PC or on the serve...

What versions are all these bugs fixed in? Can we find release notes anywhere? 

Hi there, i dont really get the description of this issue , im going to upgrade from 9.1.5 to 9.1.7(29), and i have a 256 MB flash memory and 2G RAM, ASA 5540 , will this bug affect me? i also would like to know if the 9.1.7(29) compatible with ASDM ...

hi all,   having a challenge with CPU Utilisation  %DXMRVL_DRV_ERR-2-DXMRVL_DRV_INTER_ERR: DXMRVL driver Layer Internal Error: Could not remove entry from shadow table for port [63] Mac:0100.5e00.0118 on Vlan [1] for device [1  

Hi, The following is the response from cisco bug api where the highlighted part in the response   "product": "Cisco Catalyst 3560 Series Switches" shows only one product i.e.,  Cisco Catalyst 3560 Series Switches   { "id": "3", "base_...

Virtual ISE box affected ?  R-ISE-VM-K9=  Version 2.2.0.470 ?

As far as I can tell there is no fix for this.  The Security advisory tells me to look at he Bug ID and the Bug ID tells me to look at the Security Advisory.   Am I missing something?

Hello,   What does it mean "Device with default configuration" under the problem conditions? How can I verify this default configuration?   In addition, how can I determine if my product is vulnerable to this bug/advisory?   Thank you,

What an easy solution. But how can we install the license if we cannot boot the device.    I have this problem at the exact moment but the Nexus won't boot completely so I cannot install the license.