If anyone else has encountered the bug indicated in the title of this discussion, we found adding the following SRV records in our DNS for each of our AD DCs significantly improved the responsiveness of ADUC, if it did not resolve the issue entirely....
It's been 2 years since this request was submitted. How long does it take to merely un-blacklist a command for FTD?My workaround: Deploy a Raspberry Pi to provide specific DNS servers through DHCP to the VLAN where the Cisco Next-Generation Firewall ...
Dear CommunityOn my RV345 I get the same bugged notification, but at "alert" level and not "info" level.Because of that we receive and email notification every night (it's not new, we have that alert from years ago).We don't have Webfilter enable.Our...
Hi,I have the same issue said in the CSCvy92123 bug, but the model of the device is different. It is a ESA C395 model... According to the description of the bug, it doesn't seem to be a problem on the raid, but I'm not sure.Is there any way which I c...
I have to run Cisco Jabber on my machine in case someone wants to call me. Otherwise I don't need it. So I've set it up to automatically start. But it's annoying to have the window in my task bar every day when I start my machine. It's two clicks to ...
We have a policy set with 751 policies, and this has become so much of a problem that we can't find, nor delete, any policies anymore.We're already using Firefox.Any chance of having usable filtering inside authorization policy sets anytime soon? Tha...
Has anyone seen this bug on 6.6.3? We are experiencing very similar symptoms on an ASR9006 running 6.6.3 with the following packages Active Packages: 14asr9k-xr-6.6.3 version=6.6.3 [Boot image]asr9k-iosxr-fwding-64-3.0.0.2-r663.CSCvr37042asr9k-k9sec-...
Symptom: LUNs disconnecting and/or server fails to boot when using FC/FCoE. The VMware vmkernel logs will show many of the following messages: 2016-06-21T04:32:36.106Z cpu25:33191)<3>fnic : 2 :: hdr status = FCPIO_DATA_CNT_MISMATCH I see a Cisco Bug ...
For Cisco Unified CCX Enhanced Administration System version: 12.0.1.10000-24 (ES02-26), is there a patch released to fix this version which was affected by the vulnerability.
Is there a explanation as to why the 'Known Affected Releases' and 'Known Fixed Releases' both show Bengaluru-17.4.1? We're trying to troubleshoot an issue and clarification of why Bengaluru-17.4.1 shows as affected would be helpful.
Hi Guys, My ASR is running "Version 16.12.05" and has the same issue. The only way to fix this is to reload the ASR. Anyone else had the same issue? Thanks.
