Email Security

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

Important Announcements

Cisco Secure Email Add-Ins No Longer Supported on Microsoft Outlook 2019

This is to inform you that, effective October 14, 2025, Microsoft Outlook 2019 is no longer supported for the Secure Email Encryption Service Add-In and Secure Email Submission Add-In.

To continue using these Add-Ins, we recommend upgrading to Microsoft 365. Starting October 2025, download and install the new manifest for:

- Secure Email Encryption Service Add-In from the CRES Admin Dashboard

- Secure Email Submission Add-In from the Cisco Software Download Portal

After downloading the manifests, follow the instructions provided in the Submission and Encryption Add-In guides. For more information, see: Cisco Email Encryption - End-User Guides.

TLS 1.0/1.1 Deprecation from AsyncOS for Secure Email Gateway, Starting version 16.5

We would like to inform you that starting with the AsyncOS 16.5 release, TLS versions 1.0 and 1.1 will no longer be available as configuration options in both the CLI and GUI.

To ensure secure email delivery and receipt, you should use TLS versions 1.2 and 1.3. These versions can be configured via the sslconfig CLI command or through the System Administration > SSL Configuration menu in the user interface.

For detailed instructions on updating TLS versions, please refer to the “System Administration” section of the User Guide for AsyncOS 16.0.x for Cisco Secure Email Gateway.

 

Forum Posts

  Important: Migrate from Secure Email Virtual C100V Models to Avoid McAfee-Related Issues Dear Valued Customer, We are reaching out to ensure your Cisco Secure Email environment continues to operate at optimal performance and reliability. As worklo...

dmccabej by Cisco Employee
  • 1517 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

This morning I saw a new upgrades available on the box:Upgrades available:1. AsyncOS 4.5.0 build 736 upgrade, 2005-10-13while now, I'm running 4.5.0-735, what is the new updates on 736?Anyone?

Is anyone else here using Bonded Sender?We are but we are noticing that Bonded Sender is inflating our output by approximately 3 to 4 times. Anyone else seeing this? (a concern for us as we have a limit on how many emails we can sender using the Bond...

-updated subject to correctly categorize-We are seeing a high number of these on our limited honeypot accounts and are curious whether other people are suffering from them and to what degree, as well as what measures you have taken to mitigate them, ...

Hi, Is anyone else having problems with doing TLS as preferred? We have found this issue:1) if the remote site offers TLS but it does not work, the Ironport is unable to send the email and eventually it gets too old and is return to the sender as und...

We would like to send a copy of all NDRs, DSNs, etc. to a particular email address. How would you handle that? I thought I could do it through bounceconfig as there is an option, "Do you want hard bounces sent to an alternate address?" but that redi...

Folks,1) smtpauth with ldap should be binding rather than retrieving password. Since userPassword is a multi-values attribute (SunDS), when grabbing the password to check, the DS returns the newest one first and auth fails. We have multiple passwor...

Unanswered Topics