Cisco SBC - adjancency sip: under remote-address/signalling peer is DNS instead of static IP possible?

[Netmart]

Cisco SBC [ASR 1006]

I was wondering, whether it is possible to use DNS entry instead of static IPs under remote-address and signaling-peer. We have one partner using DNS instead of IP since the peer IP is frequently changing.

Please advise.

Thanks.

Example:
adjacency sip TEST
nat force-off
signaling-address ipv4 150.100.0.1
statistics method summary
signaling-port 5060
remote-address ipv4 40.0.0.1 255.255.255.255
signaling-peer 40.0.0.1
ping-enable
realm outside
attach

[Chris Deren]

I would think so, type in the commend, i.e. "remote-address ?" to see if you get dns option instead of ipv4.

[Dennis Mink]

genius!

[Netmart]

Thank you for your intellectual input.

Basically, I wanted to know whether DNS-Based routing is possible - and the answer is probably no.

Hence, are their alternatives or workarounds to apply when it is required to route traffic to DNS-based destinations rather than to IPs?