ā05-29-2013 08:22 AM - edited ā03-16-2019 05:35 PM
Hi,
today i got aware of Bug-ID CSCth87452 with the above Title. Does anybody know if this bug is fixed in CUCM/CUC Version 9.1.1(a)? The Fixed-In INformation tells about some 8.X and 1.0.X Version, but nothing about 9.X Versions.
Any help is welcome!
/Robert
Solved! Go to Solution.
ā05-29-2013 09:13 AM
It doesn't show here
But I also don't see 9.X as affected
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk
ā05-30-2013 01:53 PM
Hi Robert,
I have never seen this in any release beyond the two listed 8.0 &
8.5(0) builds so I really don't think there is any reason to worry. And
I'm the ultimate "Paranoid" when it comes to this stuff
The 1.0(0.98000.42) would be an internal only Cisco overnight
build as per the .98xxx in the versioning so it doesn't reflect
anything that should be running out in the enterprise.
I've scoured the forums here for anybody hit by this that wasn't
running the versions I listed above and there were none.
Cheers!
Rob
"go easy...step lightly...stay free "
- The Clash
ā05-29-2013 09:13 AM
It doesn't show here
But I also don't see 9.X as affected
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk
ā05-29-2013 09:36 AM
Hi Robert,
Java is most correct here (+5). This bug manifested in 8.0 & early 8.5 builds only.
CSCth87452 - DB service is down, after changing the security password
Description
Details
Status:
Fixed
Last Modified:
May 23,2013
8.0(3.22018.1),1.0(0.98000.42)
Product:
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CallManager)
Platform:
Dependent
Severity:
2 - severe
Cheers!
Rob
"go easy...step lightly...stay free "
- The Clash
ā05-30-2013 12:54 PM
Java, Rob,
if i did understand you correctly 9.1.1(a) should not be affected. What makes me unsure is that 1.0(0.98000.42) is explicitly mentioned as a Fixed Version. This makes me think that not all Versions above 8.5 will have the fix.
/Robert
ā05-30-2013 01:53 PM
Hi Robert,
I have never seen this in any release beyond the two listed 8.0 &
8.5(0) builds so I really don't think there is any reason to worry. And
I'm the ultimate "Paranoid" when it comes to this stuff
The 1.0(0.98000.42) would be an internal only Cisco overnight
build as per the .98xxx in the versioning so it doesn't reflect
anything that should be running out in the enterprise.
I've scoured the forums here for anybody hit by this that wasn't
running the versions I listed above and there were none.
Cheers!
Rob
"go easy...step lightly...stay free "
- The Clash
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide