04-01-2013 11:16 AM
from DeviceA:
114111: *Mar 28 05:23:59.400 EET: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.1 Down BGP Notification sent
114112: *Mar 28 05:23:59.400 EET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 10.30.254.1 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes
114113: *Mar 28 05:23:59.400 EET: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.1 VPNv4 Unicast topology base removed
from session BGP Notification sent
114114: *Mar 28 05:23:59.400 EET: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.1 IPv4 Unicast topology base removed
from session BGP Notification sent
114115: *Mar 28 05:24:07.604 EET: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.1 Up
114116: *Mar 28 05:25:38.068 EET: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.1 Down BGP Notification sent
114117: *Mar 28 05:25:38.068 EET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 10.30.254.1 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes
114118: *Mar 28 05:25:38.068 EET: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.1 VPNv4 Unicast topology base removed
from session BGP Notification sent
114119: *Mar 28 05:25:38.068 EET: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.1 IPv4 Unicast topology base removed
from session BGP Notification sent
114120: *Mar 28 05:25:45.332 EET: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.1 Up
from DeviceB:
:
053002: *Mar 28 05:34:15.515 EET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 10.30.254.14 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes
053003: *Mar 28 05:34:15.515 EET: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.14 Down BGP Notification received
053004: *Mar 28 05:34:15.523 EET: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.14 VPNv4 Unicast topology base removed
from session BGP Notification received
053005: *Mar 28 05:34:15.523 EET: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.14 IPv4 Unicast topology base removed
from session BGP Notification received
053006: *Mar 28 05:34:22.779 EET: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.14 Up
053007: *Mar 28 05:35:53.271 EET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 10.30.254.14 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes
053008: *Mar 28 05:35:53.271 EET: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.14 Down BGP Notification received
053009: *Mar 28 05:35:53.279 EET: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.14 VPNv4 Unicast topology base removed
from session BGP Notification received
053010: *Mar 28 05:35:53.279 EET: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.14 IPv4 Unicast topology base removed
from session BGP Notification received
053011: *Mar 28 05:35:59.475 EET: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.30.254.14 Up
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-03-2013 12:01 AM
Hello Kamini,
Problem could be MTU mismatch between both peers, can you verify IP MTU on both tunnel interfaces?
Try to set ip tcp adjust-mss 1300
If this help to stop flapping, problem will be with MTU.
Best Regards
Please rate all helpful posts and close solved questions
04-01-2013 08:41 PM
Hi Kamini. This is a bit short to give any explanation. Can you please provide config for BGP, vlan interfaces, and ports involved in this config?. Also, it looks like there is a 30 second timer running the show, so check every protocol using such dead timers that could hit BGP.Tell us how are interconnected those 2 me3600.
cheers
04-01-2013 09:06 PM
Device A:
interface Tunnel320
description *** A to B ***
ip unnumbered Loopback0
tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
tunnel destination 10.30.254.14
tunnel mpls traffic-eng autoroute announce
tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 dynamic
tunnel mpls traffic-eng fast-reroute
router bgp 15735
template peer-policy iBGP-RRC-POLICY-TEMPLATE
route-reflector-client
advertisement-interval 0
next-hop-self
send-community both
exit-peer-policy
!
template peer-policy iBGP-POLICY-TEMPLATE
advertisement-interval 0
next-hop-self
send-community both
exit-peer-policy
!
template peer-session iBGP-RRC-SESSION-TEMPLATE
remote-as 15735
description ***For-RR-Client-Peerings***
update-source Loopback0
version 4
timers 30 90
exit-peer-session
!
template peer-session iBGP-SESSION-TEMPLATE
remote-as 15735
description ***For-Non-Client-Peerings***
update-source Loopback0
version 4
timers 30 90
exit-peer-session
=================================
Device B:
interface Tunnel300
description ***B to A***
ip unnumbered Loopback0
tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
tunnel destination 10.30.254.1
tunnel mpls traffic-eng autoroute announce
tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 dynamic
tunnel mpls traffic-eng fast-reroute
router bgp 15735
template peer-policy iBGP-POLICY-TEMPLATE
advertisement-interval 0
next-hop-self
send-community both
exit-peer-policy
!
template peer-session iBGP-SESSION-TEMPLATE
remote-as 15735
description ***For-Non-Client-Peerings***
update-source Loopback0
version 4
timers 30 90
exit-peer-session
04-02-2013 01:46 PM
Hello,
Please cross check the below one's-------
Is the tunnel is up?
What is the igp you are using for traffic engineering?
are you able to ping the tunnels head end and tail end?
you have anounced a fast reroute, is there any backup tunnel? If yes from where is it initiated?
can you trace the loopbacks which you have used in traffic engineering, are they taking desired path?
Is your ldp session is properly built?
Is there any rsvp bandwidth reservation available on the interfaces?
If you are using IS-IS as an IGP, and if it is xr have you seen whether it is or not the proble with ingle topology and
have you done the metric-style wide and traffic engineering level 1 or 2 as per the requirement is done?
If it is ospf then, are all the prerequisties done?
Please post the full configurations, I think somebody can help you?
Regards
Thanveer
"Everybody is genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is a stupid."
04-02-2013 03:21 PM
Hi,
Please default the BGP timers and take out advertisement-interval 0 command. After that if it does not stabilise, debug the BGP updates between the two routers. What is the design? Can you share it?
Ps: community is to be extended if I am not wrong...
Regards,
Alessio
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App
04-02-2013 09:11 PM
Hi,
Design attached, ambxwk1 is Device A and cmbmrs1 is Device B.
04-02-2013 09:15 PM
04-03-2013 12:01 AM
Hello Kamini,
Problem could be MTU mismatch between both peers, can you verify IP MTU on both tunnel interfaces?
Try to set ip tcp adjust-mss 1300
If this help to stop flapping, problem will be with MTU.
Best Regards
Please rate all helpful posts and close solved questions
04-03-2013 12:16 AM
Device B#show ip interface tunnel320
Tunnel320 is up, line protocol is up
Interface is unnumbered. Using address of Loopback0 (10.30.254.1)
Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255
MTU is 1596 bytes
Device A#show ip interface tunnel 300
Tunnel300 is up, line protocol is up
Interface is unnumbered. Using address of Loopback0 (10.30.254.14)
Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255
MTU is 9212 bytes
Yes, there is mtu mismatch, we tried to config manually but On Device A we couldn't configure ip mtu on the tunnel.
Device A is Cisco ME 3600
Device B is Cisco 7600
04-03-2013 12:30 AM
Have you tried ip tcp adjust-mss 1300 on tunnnel interfaces, did it help?
Configuring MTU for metro 3600:
Best Regards
Please rate all helpful posts and close solved questions
04-03-2013 12:35 AM
Will try and getback, Thanks.
04-03-2013 12:51 PM
Hello
Looks like BGP is flapping due to intermittent L2 connection loss- and the hold time has expired as the peers are not receiving any update or reply to the hellos they are sending
First check the physical interfaces for these routers (any errors?), also as suggested by others I would then check if any issue with L3 communication
apply an extended ping to the bgp peer and check the results
Res
paul
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide