03-02-2007 09:12 AM
According to Cisco document. I'm wondering why Cisco GSR series couldn't support ATM VP and port mode interworking. Is it a limitation of the technology/standard itself or simply the s/w or h/w issue of GSR router ?
05-13-2007 04:37 AM
Hi,
It's a line card hardware limitation.
BR,
Bjornarsb
05-24-2007 08:51 AM
I assume you are referring to following statement:
"Cisco 12000 series Engine 5 line cards do not support L2VPN interworking on ATM. On other line cards and platforms, only ATM AAL5 VC mode is supported; ATM VP and port mode are not supported."
L2VPN supports 2 types of Interworking, Ethernet and IP. If there is an ATM link type between PE and CE, only bridged or routed AAL5 is supported for all the platforms.
In ATMoMPLS VP traffic is transported over pw when matching VPI in an ATM header is seen from CE regardless of VCI values (excluding reserved VCI's) Similarly in ATMoMPLS Port mode ATM traffic is transported over pw regardless VPI and VCI value set by CE.
Neither in ATMoMPLS VP or Port Mode PE peeks into beyond ATM header so it has no knowledge of upper layer, hence no Ethernet or IP Interworking is not possible. It remains true in Local Switching Interworking scenarios too...
thanks,
rahul.
06-05-2007 07:18 AM
I think, it is the limitation of ATM line cards in GSR. Ip interworking is possible with ATM to transport over MPLS.
Sen...
06-05-2007 12:43 PM
Sen,
Yes, Ethernet and IP Interworking in ATM is supported on GSR Linecards but only when ATM VC is configured AAL5 mode. It is not supported in VP or Port Mode, which I believe the original question is...
thanks,
rahul.
06-13-2007 04:09 PM
Hi,
I am trying to configure local ethernet switching, it is not working, is it supported, not enough documentation is avaliable on the cisco website.
connect cust GigabitEthernet1/1/0.3600 GigabitEthernet1/1/2.3700
Router1 is a GSR, E5 Card.
router1#sh connection
ID Name Segment 1 Segment 2 State Description
============================================================================================
1 cut Gi1/1/0.3600 Gi1/1/2.3700 UP
the other side routers cannot ping across.
router1#sh run interface gig
router1#sh run interface gigabitEthernet 1/1/2.3700
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 95 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/1/2.3700
encapsulation dot1Q 3700
no ip directed-broadcast
end
interface GigabitEthernet1/1/0.3600
encapsulation dot1Q 3610
no ip directed-broadcast
end
What else is required. Other routers connected have IP addresses on each side.
Ce1 and Ce2 are 7606.
CE1#sh run interface gigabitEthernet 6/2.3600
interface GigabitEthernet6/2.3600
encapsulation dot1Q 3610
ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.252
end
CE2:
interface GigabitEthernet6/2.3700
encapsulation dot1Q 3700
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
end
Here is some infomration:
06-13-2007 06:19 PM
Atif,
L2 Local Switching is supported on the Engine 5 starting with 12.0(32)S.
What level of code do you use?
Hope this helps,
06-13-2007 06:36 PM
Hi Harold,
Is it supported on 7606? running 12.0(33)SRB
and GSR have E5 cards gige, with 12.0(32)SY.
I just don't know what I m missing. It would not ping across.
appereciate your help here.
Atif
06-13-2007 08:33 PM
7600: Only Vlan based local Layer 2 switching is supported with the restriction that you configure the Eompls on an SVI, for which you will need an Enhanced FlexWan or OSM interface facing the core. (This support is there in 12.2SX and SR)
12000: As Harold pointed it is supported from 12.0 (32)S. With Engine 5 interfaces facing the customer.
You configuration looks clean, although one thought, have you tried the VLAN same-port switching as well.
Is the result same for that too.
HTH-Cheers,
Swaroop
06-14-2007 06:01 AM
Hi Swaroop,
so what is meant by EoMPLS on an SVI, beacuse this is a local switching. can you clarify more. Here is a diagram for this setup:
CE----PE------CE, we want to switch locally so that CE can ping other CE.
7606 CE's are using this card:
Ce1#sh module 6
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
6 9 Supervisor Engine 32 8GE (Hot) WS-SUP32-GE-3B SAL1110JPYB
Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status
--- ---------------------------------- ------ ------------ ------------ -------
6 0019.aa5a.3b06 to 0019.aa5a.3b11 4.5 12.2(18r)SX2 12.2(33)SRB Ok
Mod Sub-Module Model Serial Hw Status
---- --------------------------- ------------------ ----------- ------- -------
6 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAL1109JGHM 2.3 Ok
6 Cat6k MSFC 2A daughterboard WS-F6K-MSFC2A SAL1107H4PN 4.0 Ok
Mod Online Diag Status
---- -------------------
6 Pass
PE using this card:
L3 Engine: 5 - ISE 10 Gbps
06-14-2007 06:06 AM
In the scenario you are testing, the 7600 do not need to support L2 Local Switching at all as they just act as CEs. The GSR does everything.
Regards,
06-14-2007 06:22 AM
ok agreed. previously I used the 7600 as a local switching point, and it did not work either. So was wondering the HW I have on 7600 will support or not.
tx
Atif
06-14-2007 06:39 AM
here is another setup: where 7606 is switching ethernet locally.
CE(3550)f0/12 <-----> gig1/36 (PE2)7606 6/2.3600 <----> 1/1/0.3600(GW) GSR
CE2#sh ver
Cisco IOS Software, C3550 Software (C3550-IPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(25)SEE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
CE2#sh run interface fastEthernet 0/12
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 104 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/12
no switchport
ip address 192.168.200.2 255.255.255.252
duplex full
end
PE:
PE2#sh ver
Cisco IOS Software, c7600s3223_rp Software (c7600s3223_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SRB, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc6)
cisco CISCO7606 (R7000) processor (revision 1.0) with 458752K/65536K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FOX11040T3D
R7000 CPU at 300Mhz, Implementation 0x27, Rev 3.3, 256KB L2, 1024KB L3 Cache
Last reset from power-on
1 SIP-400 controller (2 GigabitEthernet).
5 Virtual Ethernet interfaces
76 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
1915K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
PE2#sh connection
ID Name Segment 1 Segment 2 State
================================================================================
9 eth_vlan_sw Gi1/36 Gi6/2.3600 UP
PE2#sh run interface gigabitEthernet 1/36
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 76 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/36
no ip address
speed 100
duplex full
end
PE2#sh run interface gigabitEthernet 6/2.3600
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 67 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet6/2.3600
encapsulation dot1Q 3700
end
GW:
GW#sh run int GigabitEthernet1/1/0.3600
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 146 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/1/0.3600
encapsulation dot1Q 3700
ip address 192.168.200.1 255.255.255.252
no ip directed-broadcast
end
GW#ping 192.168.200.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.200.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
.
06-14-2007 07:35 AM
If I use Feature Navigator to look for:
Layer 2 Local Switching: Ethernet to VLAN feature.
These platforms shows up:
3845
7200
IAD2801
IOS:
12.4XJ
12.4T
is this output from feature navigator valid? on the other side documentation do mention 7606 and GSR.
Comments?
06-14-2007 12:56 PM
Atif,
L2 Local switching is not supported natively on the PFC3b and requires extra hardware such as the SIP-400 or the ES20.
Hope this helps,
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide