06-08-2021 12:17 PM
Hello,
We are currently using an RV325 for our Internet-facing router. There are a few port-forwarding rules and firewall rules on it. We also have a single DMZ IP configured on one of the RV325's ports.
We also have a Meraki MX100 for our VPN needs. This Meraki is also Internet-facing without going through our RV325.
The RV325 is either EOL or soon to be, and we are looking to replace it.
Can we use the Meraki as our new router? I know it's not its main feature, but I thought perhaps we could use the firewall options on the Meraki to replace our RV325....
Thanks for the advice,
Marc
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-10-2021 08:04 AM
Same fearures like RV - the new RV340 is new model for replacement.
06-08-2021 05:24 PM
Meraki mostly managed in the Cloud, so if you lost Internet, the device can not be managed (that is drawback we need to keep in mind)
This is mostly used with Merak AP as a concentrator for the AP. you can use it as traditional FW and other stuff.. (it can not replace 100% RV features or any other cisco WAN Router FW features).
we do use MX 100 and higher version for the SMB AP concentrator.
Look at some guides :
https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/NAT_and_Port_Forwarding
Since you have setup, you can explore the feature by testing, before you 100% replace RV
06-10-2021 05:52 AM
So basically I shouldn't replace the RV with the Meraki, but with another RV.
The cloud access of the Meraki is enough of a drawback.
Which router would be a suitable replacement for the RV325 ?
06-10-2021 08:04 AM
Same fearures like RV - the new RV340 is new model for replacement.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide